Background and objective: The increasing emergence and spread of drug-resistant pathogens resulting from inappropriate antibiotic usage have become more evident in recent years, particularly with the rising incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Since joining the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Costa Rica can now compare its healthcare system with other countries, and similarities have been noted with Italy regarding health indicators. Both nations have universal healthcare systems, covering their entire populations, and hold similar positions in the Human Development Index (HDI). Consequently, the goal is to compare antibiotic prescribing and consumption patterns to collaboratively develop strategies against bacterial resistance. Methods: In order to compare antibiotic consumption between regions, a standardized contrast was utilized, specifically using the Defined Daily Dose (DDD). An Orthogonal Contrast test was performed to test the means, followed by the application of the Student's t-test on these contrasts. This analysis aimed to assess the potential influence of regions on DDD values. Antibiotic consumption data were collected between January 2021 and December 2022 from the Local Health Authority of Naples 3 South (LHANS) in Italy and IQVIA reports in Costa Rica.Results: LHANS shows a considerable disparity in gross expenditure compared to Italy's overall expenditure, while the private sector in Costa Rica exhibits even lower gross expenditure than Italy. Antibiotic consumption in Italy exceeds that of Costa Rica, with Costa Rica's consumption amounting to 47.70% of Italy's total consumption. Additionally, LHANS exhibited a 22.43% higher gross expenditure compared to the Campania region, emphasizing the variability in antibiotic usage within the same country The results indicated no statistically significant differences in antibiotic consumption between the regions, as none of the null hypotheses were rejected. Conclusions:The study provides valuable insights into expenditure patterns and antibiotic consumption, highlighting the need for improved prescribing practices and awareness campaigns to address the issue of antibiotic resistance. The findings emphasize the importance of implementing international guidelines to combat the growing threat of antibiotic resistance and ensure the effective management of infectious diseases.

Background: Invasive fungal infections significantly contribute to mortality and morbidity rates. Despite the presence of all four major classes of antifungal medications, it is estimated that these infections result in the death of 1.5 million people each year, and death rates are increasing at an alarming rate. With increasing concerns about the emergence of antifungal resistance, there is a growing consideration in many countries to incorporate antifungal stewardship into existing antimicrobial stewardship programs. This approach aims to address issues hindering the appropriate use of antifungal drugs and to optimize their utilization. Methods: An analytical retrospective study of 48 hospitalized patients was conducted to assess factors related to the use of systemic antifungals and develop and implement an internal protocol to improve its use. Results: All patients with severe comorbidity had SOFA scores linked with a mortality risk of more than 10%. Based on 48 evaluations of antifungal orders, 62.5% were considered appropriate, 14.6% were considered debatable, and 22.9% were considered inappropriate. Infectious disease physicians made most of the prescriptions considered appropriate in this study. Conclusions: Comorbidities and risk factors in patients receiving systemic antifungals can be associated with the development of more serious fungal infections; hence, the implementation of antifungal stewardship as a complement to antimicrobial stewardship programs can help facilitate decision-making when dealing with a suspected case of fungal infection.

Heart failure (HF) is a syndrome suffered by more than 26 million people worldwide. SGLT2 inhibitors are drugs that have been shown to positively affect the management of HF patients, regardless of their diabetes status. A retrospective observational study was conducted on heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) enrolled at the HF clinic, who were on SGLT2 inhibitors. For these patients, baseline and follow-up data were collected and analyzed over time. Changes over time were quantified and statistical analysis was conducted to validate whether the changes were significant. After the screening of all the HF program patients, 24 met the inclusion criteria, with an average age of 68 years. Through the study, it was possible to find a statistically significant difference in the values of NT-ProBNP before and after adding a SGLT2 inhibitor in 14 patients (p = 0.0214). In addition, there was an improvement in the NYHA functional scale of 71% and no significant change in renal function or other laboratory values. Based on the studied parameters and throughout the clinical changes during the follow-up period, it was possible to establish an improvement in HFrEF patients on SGLT2 inhibitors as part of their therapy.