Global climate change is contributing to a range of adverse environmental and weather shifts, including more intense and more frequent heatwaves and an intensification of the urban heat island effect. These changes are known to produce a set of significant and differentially distributed health problems, with a particularly high burden among poor and marginalized populations. In this article, we report findings from a qualitative study of community knowledge, attitudes, health and other concerns, and behavioral responses regarding mounting urban temperatures and related environmental health issues among Latinos living in the city of Hartford, CT in northeast United States. Findings suggest the need for enhanced participation in knowledge dissemination and preparedness planning based on the coproduction of knowledge about climate change and community responses to it. The special role of anthropology in such efforts is highlighted.
Background: Radiation-associated sarcoma (RAS) occurs following ionizing radiation exposure from a therapeutic or environmental source. Because half of all cancer patients will receive radiation therapy (RT), there is a need to understand the etiology of radiation-induced sarcomas, as these cancers are thought to exhibit worse outcomes than their sporadic counterparts. Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis of sarcoma patients treated from 2013-2019 was conducted. Univariate and survival analyses were used to distinguish the characteristics of RAS and sporadic sarcoma (SS), and further assess differences in disease presentation, cancer treatment, and survival between the two groups. Results: The incidence of RAS during the study period was 6%. Breast (25%), prostate (25%) and colorectal (15%) cancers were the most common primary tumors associated with RAS development. There was substantial variation in the characteristics of the two groups, with noted differences in the histologic compositions, clinical stage at presentation, and overall survival (Table 1). The most frequent RAS histologies were angiosarcoma (30%), leiomyosarcoma (25%) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (20%), while the most frequent SS subtypes were liposarcoma (15.5%), carcinosarcoma (13.5%) and leiomyosarcoma (11.9%). No patients with RAS had a known genetic cancer predisposition. A higher percentage of RAS patients presented at later clinical stages, as 75% of all RAS cases versus 41.9% of all SS cases were diagnosed at stage III/IV (p=0.004). RAS also exhibited overall worse outcomes, as the 5-year survival was significantly decreased compared to SS (32.6 vs 60.3%, p=0.027). Conclusion: Our study identifies marked differences in the disease characteristics and clinical outcomes of RAS and SS. Further research into cancer predisposition, biomarkers of risk, and molecular pathways of disease is essential to provide individualized care to patients with RAS. Table 1. Summary of Sporadic Sarcoma and Radiation-Associated Sarcoma Characteristics Sporadic Sarcoma Radiation-Associated Sarcoma P-Value Count 310 20 Median Age at Diagnosis (Years) 58.51 (0.02-87.74) 68.81 (48.09-84.19) 0.003 Location Trunk 109 (35.2%) Trunk 10 (50.0%) Lower Extremity 97 (31.3%) Lower Extremity 2 (10.0%) Head/Neck 36 ( 11.6%) Retroperitoneal 4 (20.0%) Other 68 (21.9%) Other 4 (20.0%) Histologic Subtype Liposarcoma 48 (15.5%) Angiosarcoma 6 (30.0%) Carcinosarcoma 42 (13.5%) Leiomyosarcoma 5 (25.0%) Leiomyosarcoma 37 (11.9%) UPS 4 (20.0%) Chondrosarcoma 36 (11.6%) Liposarcoma 3 (15.0%) Other 147 (47.4%) Other 2 (10%) Clinical Stage I & II 146 (47.1%) 4 (20.0%) 0.01 III & IV 130 (41.9%) 15 (75.0%) 0.004 Unknown 34 (11.0%) 1 (5.0%) Treatments Surgery 244 (78.7%) 12 (60.0%) 0.12 Radiation 91 (29.4%) 10 (50.0%) 0.95 Chemotherapy 105 (33.6%) 7 (35.0%) 0.35 Status at Follow-Up NED 139 (44.8% ) 6 (30.0%) AWD 74 (23.9%) 3 (15.0%) Deceased 97 (31.3%) 11 (55.0%) Five-Year Survival 60.3% 32.6% 0.027 Citation Format: Abigail Raynor, Amy Oh, Wen-I Chang, Joshua Honeyman. Radiation-associated sarcoma exhibits worse outcomes than sporadic sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5244.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.