No abstract

Ketogenic diet therapy (KDT), particularly modified Atkins diet (MAD), is increasingly recognized as a treatment for adults with epilepsy. Women with epilepsy (WWE) comprise 50% of people with epilepsy and approximately one in three have catamenial epilepsy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether adding a medium chain triglyceride emulsion to MAD to target catamenial seizures was feasible and well-tolerated. This was a prospective two-center study of pre-menopausal WWE with a catamenial seizure pattern on MAD. After a 1-month baseline interval with no changes in treatment, participants consumed betaquik® (Vitaflo International Ltd.) for 10 days each menstrual cycle starting 2 days prior to and encompassing the primary catamenial seizure pattern for five cycles. Participants recorded seizures, ketones, and menses, and completed surveys measuring tolerability. Sixteen women aged 20–50 years (mean 32) were enrolled and 13 (81.2%) completed the study. There was 100% adherence for consuming betaquik® in the women who completed the study and overall intervention adherence rate including the participants that dropped out was 81.2%. The most common side effects attributed to MAD alone prior to starting betaquik® were constipation and nausea, whereas abdominal pain, diarrhea, and nausea were reported after adding betaquik®. The high adherence rate and acceptable tolerability of betaquik® shows feasibility for future studies evaluating KDT-based treatments for catamenial seizures.

Background Medication non‐adherence contributes to post‐transplant graft rejection and failure; however, limited knowledge about the reasons for non‐adherence hinders the development of interventions to improve adherence. We conducted focus groups with solid organ transplant recipients regarding overlooked challenges in the process of transplant medication self‐management and examined their adherence strategies and perceptions towards the post‐transplant medication regimen. Methods We conducted four focus groups with n = 31 total adult transplant recipients. Participants had received kidney, liver, or combined liver/kidney transplant at Johns Hopkins Hospital between 2014 and 2019. Focus groups were audio‐recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were analyzed inductively, using the constant comparative method. Results Responses generally fell into two major categories: (1) barriers to adherence and (2) “adherence landscape”. We define the former as factors directly labeled as barriers to adherence by participants and the latter as factors that heavily influence the post‐transplant medication self‐management process. Conclusions We propose a shift in the way healthcare providers and researchers, address the question of medication non‐adherence. Rather than asking why patients are non‐adherent, we suggest that constructing and understanding patients’ “adherence landscape” will provide an optimal way to align the goals of patients and providers and boost health outcomes.