Background Despite the existence of specific recommendations, patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have shown low immunization rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adherence to vaccination recommendations by physicians to their IBD patients. Methods An online anonymous survey was sent to 8000 patients from a national patient association (ACCU-Spain). Three invitations were sent between October-December 2020. Questions were jointly designed by ACCU and GETECCU. Potential reasons for vaccination compliance were evaluated and analysed for different vaccines: age, gender, type of IBD, type of healthcare and treatments. Descriptive analyses and logistic regression were performed to identify factors associated with adherence to vaccination recommendations. Results 1302 patients with IBD responded to the survey (mean age 43 years [SD 12], 72% women). Forty percent of patients had ulcerative colitis, 58% Crohn’s disease and 2% indeterminate colitis. 91% of patients were treated in public facilities, 5% in a private setting and 4% in both. 41% of patients were treated with 5ASA, 35% with azathioprine/methotrexate, 50% with biologics and 8% with corticosteroids. Although [IRL1] [YZ2] physicians recommended vaccination, 45% were not adherent to papilloma virus vaccine, 18% to pneumococcus, 18% to hepatitis B vaccine, 16% to influenza and 12% to tetanus. The main reason for non-compliance to physician recommendation was considering that is not necessary (Table 1). Some factors associated to vaccine compliance are shown in Table 2. Conclusion Non-adherence to vaccination recommendations in IBD patients is frequent. Patients with immunosuppressive therapy show less compliance to the vaccination recommendations. The importance and benefits of vaccination needs to be explained to improve the adherence in IBD patients.

Background Despite the existence of specific recommendations, patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) have shown low immunization rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the management of vaccines in clinical practice in IBD from the perspective of physicians and patients. Methods An online anonymous survey was sent to 8000 patients from a national patient association (ACCU-Spain) and 1000 members of the Spanish IBD Working Group (GETECCU). Three invitations were sent between October-December 2020. Forty questions were jointly designed by ACCU and GETECCU in two different surveys for physicians and patients. Descriptive analyses were performed, comparing physician’s and patient’s responses by standard statistical analyses Results 144 physicians and 1302 patients responded to the surveys (overall mean age of 43 years (SD 9.5). 65% of physicians managed more than 200 patients and 80% had >5 years of experience. Most physicians (99%) were concerned about vaccines in IBD patients in their clinical practice, and 63% of them considered vaccines very important. Only 3.5% of physicians recommended live vaccines for their IBD patients with immunosuppressive treatments. One third of physicians did not recommend HPV vaccine. In spite of 69% of physicians recommending influenza vaccine during pregnancy, only 7.2% of pregnant patients indicated that they had received advice on influenza vaccination on their pregnancy (p<0.001). Only 16.6% of physicians recommended live vaccines during the first year of life in children born to mothers exposed to biologics, and 4.4% did not recommend inactive vaccines. Moreover, patients treated with biologics considered that physicians were well trained in vaccines, compared to those treated with other drugs. Table 1 summarizes the perspective of physicians and patients. Conclusion Deficiencies in knowledge regarding vaccination of IBD patients can be frequent. The perspective of physicians and patients is different, with physicians perceiving more recommendations related to vaccines than patients were recommended.

Background Quality of care (QoC) is a highly important topic in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We recently elaborated a decalogue of QoC indicators (IQCARO-QoC) developed by IBD patients. The aim of the present study was to assess the factors associated with patients’ evaluation of QoC in Spain using the IQCARO-QoC Decalogue recently developed by IBD patients. Methods A survey including patients’ socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, and the IQCARO-QoC Decalogue, was completed by IBD patients. We described patients’ assessment of QoC across Spanish patients. A univariable and multivariable analysis was performed to explore the associations between patients’ characteristics and QoC. Results Questionnaires from 788 participant patients were analysed. Participants’ mean age was 43.4 years, 63% were females and 58% had Crohn’s disease. The mean QoC score was 8.1 (± 2.4 SD) points out of a maximum of 10. Items with the lowest score were related to the provision of information and the implication of the medical team throughout the entire patient care. Factors associated with better QoC scores included: being employed better disease control, fewer numbers of unscheduled visits, and being followed by a gastroenterologist specialized in IBD. Conclusions Spanish patients’ reported QoC seems to be globally good although there is room for improvement, especially in providing adequate information to patients. Care provided by specialized IBD gastroenterologists seems to be related with higher QoC scores.