No abstract

No abstract

A common problem in the biotech sector of developing countries is that a large portion of students attain a poor conceptual understanding of the basic theory and/or lack proficiency in basic laboratory skills even as they complete higher studies such as a master's degree. A small scale solution was developed in the form of a unique post-graduate diploma program that imparted reliable skills in students with good theoretical knowledge. The course of 6 to 8 months duration, with an optional 6 months internship, was successfully conducted for 8 batches. Most students of this course inculcated the right laboratory practices. This was evident by safe operations, and precise as well as accurate results of quantitative experiments conducted by them. They learned to work independently as well as in teams. They could create and follow standard operating procedures, and contribute to general laboratory maintenance. Every student also designed, prepared and conducted routine molecular biology experiments. The following aspects are suggested for successfully dealing with the patchy and varied capacities of life science students during higher (post bachelor's) studies: a) careful selection of students, b) training with prioritized objectives, c) attention to basic lab-practices, d) opportunities to selflearn, e) structured group discussions, f) teacher(s) with genuine interest and passion, g) reasonable infrastructure, and h) maintaining a good student-instructor ratio. The course objectives, structure, teaching methods, and experiences are presented here along with some of the relevant data, including statistics about improvement in the precision and accuracy in experimental results by students. Limitations in this course and a general critical perspective of the routine higher education have also been discussed briefly.

With increasing number of bio-literature search engines, scientists and health professionals either make a subjective choice of tool(s) or face a challenge of analyzing multiple features of a plethora of bibliographic software. There is an urgent need for a thorough comparative analysis of the available literature scanning tools, from the user’s perspective. We report results of the first time semi-quantitative comparison of 21 search programs, which can search published (partial or full text) documents in life science areas. The observations can assist life science researchers and medical professionals to make an informed selection among the programs, depending on their search objectives. Some of the important findings are: 1. Most of the hits obtained from Scopus, ReleMed, EBImed, CiteXplore, and HighWire Press were usually relevant (i.e., these tools showed a better precision than other tools). 2. But a very high number of relevant citations were retrieved by HighWire Press, Google Scholar, CiteXplore and Pubmed Central (they had better recall). 3. HWP and CiteXplore seemed to have a good balance of precision and recall efficiencies. 4. PubMed Central, PubMed and Scopus provided the most useful query systems. 5. GoPubMed, BioAsk, EBIMed, ClusterMed could be more useful among the tools that can automatically process the retrieved citations for further scanning of bio-entities such as proteins, diseases, tissues, molecular interactions etc). The authors suggest the use of PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and HighWire Press - for better coverage, and GoPubMed - to view the hits categorized based on the MeSH and gene ontology terms.