Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hasil analisis rasio solvabilitas pada sektor basic materials yang terdaftar di BEI pada periode 2011-2021. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu PT. Tjiwi Kimia Tbk, PT. Alakasa Industrindo Tbk, dan PT. Indal Aluminium Industry Tbk. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif menggunakan jenis data sekunder berupa catatan laporan keuangan perusahaan maupun laporan historis selama periode 2011-2021 yang telah dipublikasikan pada situs resmi Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan kinerja keuangan pada perusahaan TKIM (PT. Tjiwi Kimia Tbk) dalam keadaan yang cukup baik dibandingkan dengan perusahaan ALKA (PT. Alakasa Industrindo Tbk) dan INAI (PT. Indal Aluminium Industry Tbk). Hal tersebut dapat dilihat dari debt to asset ratio dan debt to equity ratio perusahaan TKIM (PT. Tjiwi Kimia Tbk) dengan rata-rata selama kurun waktu 11 tahun cenderung lebih rendah dari perusahaan ALKA (PT. ALKA Tbk) dan perusahaan INAI (PT. INAI Tbk).

The study's purpose was to determine whether there is a two-way influence between debt and receivables, the response of a variable to sShocks that occur in other variables and the contribution of each variable to other variables. Debt and receivable data are taken from 48 of the 91 companies in the basic industrial sector listed on the IDX. The statistical model used in this study is the Vector Autoregression Model, which aims to test the direction of influence between two variables. The results show that debt affects receivables, while accounts receivable do not affect debt. So there is only a one-way relationship between debt to receivables. This finding reinforced that the debt response to the shock in receivables did not find a significant response. Meanwhile, the response of receivables variable shock to itself since period 1 has fluctuated and has been stable since period 6. The receivables response to the shock in debt began to respond in the second period and was stable from period 6. The contribution of the receivable variable to itself had a negative trend. In contrast, the contribution of the variable debt to receivables shows a positive direction.