Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is well known for its peculiarly skewed distribution with highest incidence in Southern Chinese population. Familial aggregation is evident, hence screening for early detection is offered by oncology centers in Hong Kong to first-degree relatives of patients with NPC. During the period 1994 -2001, 929 family members were screened in our center. The screenees were advised to attend an annual examination that includes serological test against Epstein Barr Virus (EBV), physical examination to exclude cervical lymphadenopathy and cranial nerve palsy, and endoscopic examination of the nasopharyngeal region. Two different methods were used for the serology test: indirect immuno-fluorescent (IF) test for IgA against viral capsid antigen; and starting in 1997 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELIZA) against nuclear antigen and viral capsid antigen. Twelve cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma were diagnosed, giving a detection rate of 5/1,155 (433/100,000) person-year for male and 7/1,404 (499/100,000) person-year for female participants observed. The corresponding average annual incidence in Hong Kong during this period was 24.1 and 9.6 per 100,000, respectively. Forty-one percent of these detected cases had Stage I disease, whereas only 2% of patients referred to the department for primary treatment presented with such early disease. Six cases were detected at first visit, and all were EBV-positive. Another 78 screenees with positive serology at first visit were followed up for 204 person years, and thus far NPC was detected in 3 after an interval of 6 -32 months. Of the 845 initially EBV-negative screenees followed up for 2,337 person-years, NPC was detected in 3 after an interval of 12-45 months. One showed sero-conversion at the time of diagnosis. We conclude that family members of known patients do show a substantially higher risk of developing NPC, and regular screening by current method improves the chance of early detection. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Key words: nasopharyngeal carcinoma; family aggregation; screening Although rare in most parts of the world, nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is common in Southern China and parts of SouthEast Asia, 1 and the incidence is highest among the Cantonesespeaking residents. According to the Hong Kong Cancer Registry, it ranked 4th for males and 9th for females for new cancers. In 1999, there were 1,118 newly diagnosed cases and 371 deaths registered. The average annual age-standardized incidence rate is 24.1/100,000 for males and 9.6/100,000 for females. 2 Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) has long been implicated in the pathogenesis of NPC. 3 Old et al. 4 first made the association of EBV with NPC using immunodiffusion when patients with undifferentiated NPC showed elevated IgG and IgA antibody titers against EA-D (early antigen-diffuse) and VCA (viral capsid antigen). Using in situ hybridization techniques, EBV DNA has also been confirmed in NPC tumour cells. 5 Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma usually exhibit high levels of antibodies directed again...

Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an advanced technique of external beam radiation therapy that delivers large ablative doses of radiation. In the past decade, many cancer centers have adopted SBRT as one mode of radically treating small-sized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), based on encouraging clinical outcomes. SBRT thus seems reasonable as first-line treatment of inoperable HCC confined to the liver. However, most of the clinical studies to date have been retrospective in nature, with key issues still under investigation. Summary: The above-mentioned publications were subjected to scrutiny, fueling discussions at the 7th Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert (APPLE 2016) Meeting on various clinical variables, such as indications for SBRT, therapeutic outcomes, treatment-related toxicities, doses prescribed, and specific techniques. The consensus reached should be of interest to all professionals active in the treatment of HCC, especially radiation oncologists. Key Messages: SBRT is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with small-sized HCC, offering substantial local control, improved overall survival, and low toxicity.

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is highly prevalent in Hong Kong due to the high prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection. Liver cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer death. Due to the high case load, there is a high level of local expertise in treating HCC, and the full spectrum of treatment modalities is available. This document summarizes how these modalities should be used based on the latest evidence. Summary: In 2 meetings held in early 2017, a multidisciplinary group of Hong Kong clinicians, including liver surgeons, interventional radiologists, clinical oncologists, and medical oncologists, met to update local consensus statements for management of HCC. These statements are based on the latest evidence and give detailed guidance on how to deploy these modalities, in particular for cases of HCC which are not suited to surgical resection. Key Messages: These statements give detailed information on how to decide if a patient is a candidate for resection, methods to improve candidacy for resection, and guidance for use of various nonsurgical interventions to manage patients ineligible for resection.

BaCKgRoUND aND aIMS:There are no prospective data on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a bridge to liver transplantation for HCC. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SBRT as bridging therapy, with comparison with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).appRoaCH aND ReSUltS: Patients were prospectively enrolled for SBRT under a standardized protocol from July 2015 and compared with a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent TACE or HIFU from 2010. The primary endpoint was tumor control rate at 1 year after bridging therapy. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidence of dropout, toxicity, and posttransplant survival.During the study period, 150 patients were evaluated (SBRT, n = 40; TACE, n = 59; HIFU, n = 51). The tumor control rate at 1 year was significantly higher after SBRT compared with TACE and HIFU (92.3%, 43.5%, and 33.3%, respectively; P = 0.02). With competing risk analysis, the cumulative incidence of dropout at 1 and 3 years after listing was lower after SBRT (15.1% and 23.3%) compared with TACE (28.9% and 45.8%; P = 0.034) and HIFU (33.3% and 45.1%; P = 0.032). Time-to-progression at 1 and 3 years was also superior after SBRT (10.8%, 18.5% in SBRT, 45%, 54.9% in TACE, and 47.6%, 62.8% in HIFU; P < 0.001). The periprocedural toxicity was similar, without any difference in perioperative complications and patient and recurrence-free survival rates after transplant. Pathological complete response was more frequent after SBRT compared with TACE and HIFU (48.1% vs. 25% vs. 17.9%, respectively; P = 0.037). In multivariable analysis, tumor size <3 cm, listing alpha-fetoprotein <200 ng/mL, Child A, and SBRT significantly reduced the risk of dropout.CoNClUSIoNS: SBRT was safe, with a significantly higher tumor control rate, reduced the risk of waitlist dropout, and should be used as an alternative to conventional bridging therapies. (Hepatology 2021;74:2580-2594. L iver transplantation (LT) is the best treatment option for selected patients with early HCC. (1,2) The implementation of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception points for patients with HCC aimed to alleviate the

Background and Objective Hong Kong, like many parts of Asia, faces a high burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) caused by high endemic rates of hepatitis B virus infection. Hong Kong clinicians have developed a high level of expertise in HCC treatment across surgical, transarterial, ablative, radiotherapeutic and systemic modalities. This publication summarizes the latest evidence-based recommendations on how these modalities should be used. Methods In two meetings held in 2020, a multidisciplinary panel of surgeons, oncologists and interventional radiologists performed a narrative review of evidence on the management of HCC, with an emphasis on treatment of HCC not amenable to surgical resection. Close attention was paid to new evidence published since the previous version of these statements in 2018. Key Content and Findings The expert panel has formulated 60 consensus statements to guide the staging and treatment of unresectable HCC. Since the previous version of these statements, considerable additions have been made to the recommendations on use of targeted therapies and immunotherapies because of the large volume of new evidence. Conclusions Our consensus statements offer guidance on how to select HCC patients for surgical or non-surgical treatment and for choosing among non-surgical modalities for patients who are not candidates for resection. In particular, there is a need for more evidence to aid physicians in the selection of second-line systemic therapies, as currently most data are limited to patients with disease progression on first-line sorafenib.