Background:Laboratory-based experiments demonstrate that fatigue may contribute to lower extremity injury (LEI). Few studies have examined the timing of LEIs during competition and practice, specifically in high school athletes across multiple sports, to consider the possible relationship between fatigue and LEIs during sport events.Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to describe the timing of LEIs in high school athletes within games and practices across multiple sports, with a hypothesis that more and severe injuries occur later in games and practices.Study Design:Descriptive epidemiologic study.Level of Evidence:Level 4.Methods:Using the National High School RIO (Reporting Information Online) sport injury surveillance system, LEI severity and time of occurrence data during practice and competition were extracted for 9 high school sports.Results:During the school years 2005-2006 through 2013-2014, 16,967,702 athlete exposures and 19,676 total LEIs were examined. In all sports surveyed, there was a higher LEI rate, relative risk for LEI, and LEI requiring surgery during competition than practice. During practice, the majority of LEIs occurred over an hour into practice in all sports. In quarter-based competition, more LEIs occurred in the second (31% to 32%) and third quarters (30% to 35%) than in the first (11% to 15%) and fourth quarters (22% to 26%). In games with halves, the majority (53% to 66%) of LEIs occurred in the second half. The greater severity LEIs tended to occur earlier in games.Conclusion:Fatigue may play a role in the predominance of injuries in the second half of games, though various factors may be involved. Greater severity of injuries earlier in games may be because of higher energy injuries when athletes are not fatigued.Clinical Relevance:These findings can help prepare sports medicine personnel and guide further related research to prevent LEIs.
Wilson, JC, Levek, C, Daoud, AK, Brewer, M, Brooks, K, Sochanska, A, Randall, M, and Provance, AJ. Web-based exercise program increases cervical strength in adolescent athletes. J Strength Cond Res 35(4): 1149–1155, 2021—This cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a web-based 6-week cervical strengthening program on cervical strength in adolescent athletes. It was hypothesized that subjects completing the program would demonstrate significant increase in cervical muscle strength compared with baseline strength. Eighty-three high school soccer athlete subjects were recruited from 2 local nationally competitive soccer clubs. Teams were assigned to either control or intervention groups to minimize information crossover. Fifty subjects were recruited to the intervention group (29 male, 21 female; average age 15.1 years). Thirty-three subjects were recruited to the control group (21 male, 12 female; average age 15.1 years). Intervention group subjects completed a web-based progressive cervical strengthening program over 6 weeks. Cervical strength in flexion, extension, right and left lateral flexion (LLF) was measured in Newton (N) of force at 3 time points during the competitive season for both control and intervention groups. Intervention group subjects significantly increased cervical strength [mean difference (95% confidence interval)] in LLF [24.1 (15.9–32.4)], extension [27.9 (18.4–37.5)], right lateral flexion [18.8 (11.6–26.1)], and flexion [mean ratio: 1.2 (1.1–1.2)] at follow-up testing; whereas control subjects did not see significant changes in strength. A web-based progressive cervical strengthening program improves cervical muscular strength in a population of adolescent athletes over a period of 6 weeks. Such a program could be used by researchers in future studies evaluating the influence on concussion risk and by practitioners as a means of reducing sport-related head and neck injuries.
Objective: To compare maximal cervical muscle strength among athletes with a history of 2 or more concussions relative to athletes with no history of a previous concussion. Design: Athletes in the 2 groups were frequency-matched. Linear mixed models were used to test for differences in peak isometric flexion, extension, left lateral flexion, and right lateral flexion cervical muscle torque between groups. Setting: Pediatric sports medicine clinic. Participants: Athletes with a history of multiple concussions (n = 16) and athletes with no previous concussion history (n = 17). Interventions (or Assessment of Risk Factors or Independent Variables): Concussion history (group), age, sex, neck girth, and height. Main Outcome Measures: Peak isometric torque measured with a stationary isokinetic dynamometer during a 3-second isometric hold. Results: There was no significant difference in peak flexion [mean difference: 21.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI): −6.6% to 57.4%, P = 0.1413], extension (mean difference: 17%, 95% CI, −6.8% to 47.1%, P = 0.1667), left lateral (mean difference: 4.4%, 95% CI, −16.9% to 31.1%, P = 0.7011), or right lateral (mean difference: 9.3%, 95% CI, −14.5% to 39.8%, P = 0.4627) isometric torque in the concussion group relative to the control group. Across all muscle actions, neck torque was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in male compared with female athletes. Increasing neck girth was also associated with a significant (P < 0.05) increase in neck torque. Conclusions: There was no evidence of a consistent cervical muscle strength deficit among athletes with a history of 2 or more concussions relative to athletes with no previous history of a concussion. Age, neck girth, and sex were significantly associated with cervical muscle strength. Clinical Relevance: Isometric cervical muscle strength testing may not be a reliable test for differentiating athletes with a history of multiple concussions relative to athletes with no history of concussions in the pediatric and adolescent population. Our study presents a reliable methodology for testing cervical muscle strength among young athletes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.