Objective: Previous research suggests that literacy level may be a better predictor of cognitive performance than years of education in minoritized groups. Although literacy tests remain a mainstay in the context of neuropsychological evaluations due to their role in the estimation of premorbid intellectual functioning, there is relatively little research examining the role of literacy in the relationship between ethnicity and cognitive performance. This study examined whether literacy level influences the relationship between ethnicity and letter fluency ability. Method: This cross-sectional study included 64 adult patients consecutively referred for outpatient neuropsychological evaluation within a large, Midwestern academic medical center. The sample was 54.7% male, 43.8% White, 56.3% Black, with Mage of 57.8 years (SD=11.7) and Meducation of 12.6 years (SD=2.5). A mediation analysis was performed using Hayes’ PROCESS macro within SPSS to evaluate whether literacy, as measured by the Test of Premorbid Functioning (TOPF), mediated the association between ethnicity (dichotomized as Black/White) and letter fluency via raw scores from the F/A/S trials. Results: The main model of the mediation analysis was significant, F (4, 51) = 13.89, p <.001, R2 = .521. After accounting for age and years of education, there was a significant mediation effect of literacy on the relationship between ethnicity and letter fluency (B = .740, SE = .143, t = 5.19, p <.001). Conclusion(s): In sum, this study provided evidence that literacy level helps explain the letter fluency performance differences observed between Black and White patients.

This study examined the utility of dichotomous versus dimensional scores across two measures of social determinants of health (SDOH) regarding their associations with cognitive performance and psychiatric symptoms in a mixed clinical sample of 215 adults referred for neuropsychological evaluation ( Mage = 43.91, 53.5% male, 44.2% non-Hispanic White). Both dimensional and dichotomous health literacy scores accounted for substantial variance in all cognitive outcomes assessed, whereas dimensional and dichotomous adverse childhood experience scores were significantly associated with psychiatric symptoms. Tests of differences between correlated correlations indicated that correlations with cognitive and psychiatric outcomes were not significantly different across dimensional versus dichotomous scores, suggesting that these operationalizations of SDOH roughly equivalently characterize risk of poorer cognitive performance and increased psychiatric symptoms. Results highlight the necessity of measuring multiple SDOH, as different SDOH appear to be differentially associated with cognitive performance versus psychiatric symptoms. Furthermore, results suggest that clinicians can use cut-scores when characterizing patients’ risk of poor cognitive or psychiatric outcomes based on SDOH.

No abstract