The repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell offered legal equality to sexual minorities in the military. However, this big step forward had no impact on the policy of exclusion and rejection and the fear and secrecy that resulted for transgender people (whether lesbian, gay, bisexual, or heterosexual). In this article, we argue that transgender citizens should have equal opportunity to honorably serve their country, and to be treated with respect and sensitivity as they do so. Many transgender persons may be drawn to military service and its ethos of masculine values. However, they are currently not permitted entry, and, if they are to enter, must remain hidden or face dismissal, leaving them vulnerable to harassment. While they report both positive and negative experiences during their service, research documents discrimination in veterans' healthcare as well as mental health risks resulting from fear and harassment. In contrast to the United States, 11 countries include transgender people in their militaries. Drawing in part from their examples, we end with recommendations for change in the direction of respect and equality of opportunity.
The quality of research methodology is unquestionably at the heart of the accuracy and utility of empirical data on transgender intimate partner violence (T-IPV). Unfortunately, T-IPV scholars must contend with a host of unique methodological challenges, including defining the population, nonprobability and probability sampling with transgender populations, IPV measure diagnostic testing on transgender samples, and inclusivity of distinct T-IPV tactics in IPV survey measures. Unlike with the more extensive and established cisgender IPV literature, the smaller and newer T-IPV literature lacks widespread agreement among scholars on the best practices needed to overcome these methodological challenges. This chapter provides an overview of these issues and, by drawing on innovative solutions from the T-IPV and broader lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer IPV literature, offers tips on overcoming these methodological challenges going forward.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.