Participation in a clinic to specifically address starting hydroxyurea after a SCA complication increases hydroxyurea use.
BACKGROUND: Health maintenance guidelines have been published to ensure optimal clinical outcomes for individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with recommendations including the evaluation of bone density, eye, and skin health. However, it has been suggested that there is variability in adherence to health maintenance recommendations. This study evaluated both the gender of providers discussing health maintenance with patients, and the overall rate of physicians' recommendations for Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, vitamin D levels, ophthalmologic exams, and skin protective measures at an urban university medical center. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed evaluating all IBD patients seen at a university gastroenterology clinic over a 5-year period was performed. Patients' IBD diagnosis, recommendations for DXA, vitamin D levels, ophthalmologic exams, and skin protective measures (sunscreen and/or dermatology referral) were obtained. Patient and physician gender were recorded. A database was generated using Microsoft Excel. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's Exact Test with significance set at P < 0.05. The study was approved by the IRB. RESULTS: 393 IBD patients were identified (175 males, 218 females) with mean age of 44.4 (age range: 20–82). 279 (71.0%) had Ulcerative Colitis (UC), 96 (24.4%) had Crohn's disease (CD), 7 (1.8%) with unspecified colitis, and 11 (2.8%) had microscopic colitis. Of the 393 patients, 279 (71.0%) were seen by male providers and 114 (29.0%) were seen by female providers. 249 (63.4%) patients had vitamin D and 110 (28%) had DXA scans performed. Ophthalmologic referrals were offered to 125 (27.8%). 83 (21.1%) were counseled about skin protective measures and given dermatology referrals. Significantly more female providers recommended vitamin D (P = 0.015), DXA screening (P = 0.027), ophthalmologic evaluations (P < 0.0001) and dermatologic referrals (P < 0.0001) compared to male providers. There was no significant difference of the performance of health maintenance recommendations based upon disease type. CONCLUSION(S): This study revealed that there was inconsistent adherence to IBD health maintenance recommendations. While female physicians more frequently recommended vitamin D screening, DXA scans, ophthalmologic examinations, and skin evaluations, there was a clear need to improve screening by all physicians. While this study was limited based upon retrospective design, small sample size, and single institution cohort, it provides a foundation for future research that addresses IBD management. Increased efforts to optimize IBD care will improve overall clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), including Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis, are among several chronic conditions approved for treatment with medical marijuana. Although evidence based on observational and animal studies is minimal, it is suspected that modulation of endocannabinoid receptors may improve inflammation and therefore symptoms associated with IBD. Individuals increasingly use the internet to gain information about alternative therapies. However, there are no studies that have evaluated online resources addressing medical marijuana and IBD. The study evaluated the readability and quality of online information readily accessible to patients and assessed the therapeutic claims, precautionary warnings, and evidence to support the use of cannabis in IBD. METHODS: A Google search using the terms “Marijuana IBD” was performed. Exclusion criteria included all veterinarian websites, duplicates and those which were non-accessible. Websites were then categorized by intended audience, either professional or consumer. Readability was determined using the validated Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Calculation. The validated DISCERN questionnaire was used to assess quality, with scores rated as Excellent 66–75, Very Good 56–65, Good 46–55, Average 36–45, or Poor ≤35. Websites were reviewed for therapeutic claims, inclusion of references, precautionary information about marijuana use and whether they discussed approved treatments for IBD. Statistical analysis using a 2-tailed Fisher's Exact Test and a Two Sample T-test were used with a P-value set at <0.05. RESULTS: 100 websites were assessed with 89 websites meeting criteria for analysis. 75 (84%) were intended for consumers and 14 (16%) were for medical professionals. The average Flesch-Kincaid Grade level was 13.3, with no significant difference (P = 0.41) between consumer (13.2 grade level) and professional (14.0 grade level) websites. Quality was rated as “Average” (mean DISCERN score 42.6), with no significant difference (P = 0.08) based upon intended audience. Consumer websites offered significantly more (P = 0.04) claims of improvement in disease pathology and less frequently listed references (P = 0.002) than websites geared towards medical professionals. There was no significant difference between consumer and professional focused websites in the discussion of the approved therapy (P = 0.38). 19 of 89 (21.3%) websites included precautionary information regarding marijuana use in IBD with no significant difference in consumer sites compared to those for medical professionals (P = 0.17). CONCLUSION(S): This study demonstrated that a multitude of online resources exist with information on medical marijuana as alternative therapy for IBD patients. The majority of these websites were intended for consumers, however their readability grade level exceeds the National Institutes of Health 6th grade recommended reading level for medical information. While the quality of information was considered “Average” using a validated measure, there was variability in available evidence-based references and inconsistency in the inclusion of precautionary information as well as the therapeutic claims made by different websites. It is critical that readily available online information about cannabis therapy in IBD be readable, evidence-based and comprehensive in order to allow for informed medical decisions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.