DNA-based surveillance of bacterial diseases has been using pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) since 1996. Currently, the international surveillance network (PulseNet international) is turning toward whole genome sequencing (WGS). The letters ATCGs of WGS are compared using several sequence alignment methods. While patterns of horizontal lines of PFGE profiles are being compared using relative positioning of bands within a range of tolerance. A recently suggested image analysis algorithm and a deployed database (geltowgs.uofk.edu) collectively invented a promising method for comparing PFGE to in-silico obtained digestion models (DMs) derived from WGS. The database requires a parameter that determines PFGE resolution. Here, the author suggests a new method for calculating this factor. Epidemiological and molecular conclusions returned by the database are evaluated. Methodology: two PFGE profiles representing XbaI digests of E. coli and Salmonella enterica analyzed by the suggested image analysis software were submitted to the database after calculating resolution of PFGE using Dice percentage of difference between the closest PFGE bands in length. E. coli and Salmonella enterica test subjects were compared to 489 and 401 DMs respectively. The three data sets returned were analyzed. Results and discussion: according to PFGE evaluation criteria; a single digestion model is possibly related to E. coli test subject. It belonged to the same serovar. No epidemiologically related DM was shown for S. enterica test subject. Conclusions mentioned earlier could never be made ignoring co-migration. Standardization of both; suggested image analysis and database algorithms will deepen our understanding of bacterial epidemiology.