Several human hereditary neurological and neurodegenerative disease genes are associated with the expansion of CTG repeats. Here we show that the frequency of genetic expansions or deletions in Escherichia coli depends on the direction of replication. Large expansions occur predominantly when the CTGs are in the leading strand template rather than the lagging strand. However, deletions are more prominent when the CTGs are in the opposite orientation. Most deletions generated products of defined size classes. Strand slippage coupled with non-classical DNA structures may account for these observations and relate to expansion-deletion mechanisms in eukaryotic chromosomes for disease genes.
Genomic rearrangements are a frequent source of instability, but the mechanisms involved are poorly understood. A 2.5-kbp poly(purine⅐pyrimidine) sequence from the human PKD1 gene, known to form non-B DNA structures, induced long deletions and other instabilities in plasmids that were mediated by mismatch repair and, in some cases, transcription. The breakpoints occurred at predicted non-B DNA structures. Distance measurements also indicated a significant proximity of alternating purine-pyrimidine and oligo(purine⅐pyrimidine) tracts to breakpoint junctions in 222 gross deletions and translocations, respectively, involved in human diseases. In 11 deletions analyzed, breakpoints were explicable by non-B DNA structure formation. We conclude that alternative DNA conformations trigger genomic rearrangements through recombination-repair activities. G ross chromosomal rearrangements are a common source of genetic instability (1). Thus, characterization of the underlying molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis is fundamental for our understanding of human disease. A hallmark of gross deletions is the presence of short homologous tracts (typically 2-8 bp) at the breakpoints (2), a finding that has prompted speculation as to the two distinct mechanisms postulated to be responsible for their formation. The slipped mispairing model (3) envisages that during lagging strand DNA synthesis, distantly located repeats are brought into close proximity by the looping out of the single-stranded region, thereby enabling the replication complex to ''jump'' from the proximal to the distal repeat and hence bypass the looped structure. Alternative models propose that various types of repetitive sequence elements may serve as substrates for intra-or intermolecular recombination (2, 4). Neither model is satisfactory; slipped mispairing is inconsistent with deletions greater than Ϸ500 bp and deletions manifesting Ͻ4-bp homologies (5-9), whereas the recombination model does not provide a rationale for the initiation of the process.Specific sequence motifs such as direct and inverted repeats, (RY⅐RY) n and (R⅐Y) n , in which R represents purine and Y represents pyrimidine, and four closely spaced G-rich direct repeats [i.e., (G⅐C) 3 ] undergo structural transitions from the orthodox right-handed B-helical duplex to higher energy state non-B structures (slipped hairpin͞loops, cruciforms, left-handed Z-helices, triplexes, and tetraplexes, respectively) (10-12) under torsional stress (negative supercoiling) in vivo.Early articles in bacteria and hamster cells reported isolated cases in which deletions could occur by a recombination-repair reaction mediated by cruciform structures forming at each breakpoint (13,14). Recently, the breakpoint junctions of the human constitutional translocations t(1;22), t(4;22), t(11;22), and t(17;22), which involve a common locus on chromosome 22q11.2, were found to coincide with large (Ͼ95 bp) cruciform structures (15-18), suggesting that this conformation may predispose specific loci to genomic rearrangements.The po...
Long CTG triplet repeats which are associated with several human hereditary neuromuscular disease genes are stabilized in ColEl-derived
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.