Summary β-barrel membrane proteins are essential for nutrient import, signaling, motility, and survival. In Gram-negative bacteria, the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) complex is responsible for the biogenesis of β-barrel membrane proteins, with homologous complexes found in mitochondria and chloroplasts. Here we describe the structure of BamA, the central and essential component of the BAM complex, from two species of bacteria: Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Haemophilus ducreyi. BamA consists of a large periplasmic domain attached to a 16-strand transmembrane β-barrel domain. Three structural features speak to the mechanism by which BamA catalyzes β-barrel assembly. First, the interior cavity is accessible in one BamA structure and conformationally closed in the other. Second, an exterior rim of the β-barrel has a distinctly narrowed hydrophobic surface, locally destabilizing the outer membrane. And third, the β-barrel can undergo lateral opening, evocatively suggesting a route from the interior cavity in BamA into the outer membrane.

Summary The outer membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria is replete with a host of β-barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs). Despite serving a variety of essential functions, including immune response evasion, the exact mechanism of OMP folding and membrane insertion remains largely unclear. The β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) complex is required for OMP biogenesis. Crystal structures and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the central and essential component, BamA, suggest a mechanism involving lateral opening of its barrel domain. MD simulations reported here reveal an additional feature of BamA: a substrate exit pore positioned above the lateral opening site. Disulfide crosslinks that prevent lateral opening and exit pore formation result in a loss of BamA function, which can be fully rescued by the reductant TCEP. These data provide strong evidence that lateral opening and exit pore formation are required for BamA function.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remain the primary conduit by which cells detect environmental stimuli and communicate with each other1. Upon activation by extracellular agonists, these seven transmembrane domain (7TM)-containing receptors interact with heterotrimeric G proteins to regulate downstream second messenger and/or protein kinase cascades1. Crystallographic evidence from a prototypic GPCR, the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR), in complex with its cognate G protein, Gs, has provided a model for how agonist binding promotes conformational changes that propagate through the GPCR and into the nucleotide binding pocket of the G protein α-subunit to catalyze GDP release, the key step required for GTP binding and activation of G proteins2. The structure also offers hints on how G protein binding may, in turn, allosterically influence ligand binding. Here we provide functional evidence that G protein coupling to β2AR stabilizes a ‘closed’ receptor conformation characterized by restricted access to and egress from the hormone binding site. Surprisingly, the effects of G protein on the hormone binding site can be observed in the absence of a bound agonist, where G protein coupling driven by basal receptor activity impedes the association of agonists, partial agonists, antagonists and inverse agonists. The ability of bound ligands to dissociate from the receptor is also hindered, providing a structural explanation for the G protein-mediated enhancement of agonist affinity, which has been observed for many GPCR-G protein pairs. Our studies also suggest that in contrast to agonist binding alone, coupling of a G protein in the absence of an agonist stabilizes large structural changes in a GPCR. The effects of nucleotide-free G protein on ligand binding kinetics are shared by other members of the superfamily of GPCRs, suggesting that a common mechanism may underlie G protein-mediated enhancement of agonist affinity.