We investigate the use of deep neural networks (DNNs) for suppressing off-axis scattering in ultrasound channel data. Our implementation operates in the frequency domain via the short-time Fourier transform. The inputs to the DNN consisted of the separated real and imaginary components (i.e. in-phase and quadrature components) observed across the aperture of the array, at a single frequency and for a single depth. Different networks were trained for different frequencies. The output had the same structure as the input and the real and imaginary components were combined as complex data before an inverse short-time Fourier transform was used to reconstruct channel data. Using simulation, physical phantom experiment, and in vivo scans from a human liver, we compared this DNN approach to standard delay-and-sum (DAS) beamforming and an adaptive imaging technique that uses the coherence factor (CF).For a simulated point target, the side lobes when using the DNN approach were about 60 dB below those of standard DAS. For a simulated anechoic cyst, the DNN approach improved contrast ratio (CR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratio by 8.8 dB and 0.3 dB, respectively, compared to DAS. For an anechoic cyst in a physical phantom, the DNN approach improved CR and CNR by 17.1 dB and 0.7 dB, respectively. For two in vivo scans, the DNN approach improved CR and CNR by 13.8 dB and 9.7 dB, respectively. We also explored methods for examining how the networks in this work function.
Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is an imaging technique that can be used to quantify tissue microstructure giving rise to scattered ultrasound. Other ultrasonic properties, e.g., sound speed and attenuation, of tissues have been estimated versus temperature elevation and found to have a dependence with temperature. Therefore, it is hypothesized that QUS parameters may be sensitive to changes in tissue microstructure due to temperature elevation. Ultrasonic backscatter experiments were performed on tissue-mimicking phantoms and freshly excised rabbit and beef liver samples. The phantoms were made of agar and contained either mouse mammary carcinoma cells (4T1) or chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO) as scatterers. All scatterers were uniformly distributed spatially at random throughout the phantoms. All the samples were scanned using a 20-MHz single-element f/3 transducer. Quantitative ultrasound parameters were estimated from the samples versus increases in temperature from 37C to 50 C in 1 C increments. Two QUS parameters were estimated from the backscatter coefficient [effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and effective acoustic concentration (EAC)] using a spherical Gaussian scattering model. Significant increases in ESD and decreases in EAC of 20%-40% were observed in the samples over the range of temperatures examined. The results of this study indicate that QUS parameters are sensitive to changes in temperature. Gaussian scattering model k wavelength Z 0 acoustic impedance of the surrounding medium Z acoustic impedance of the scatterers q density of the sample
We investigate the use of deep neural networks (DNNs) for suppressing off-axis scattering in ultrasound channel data. Our implementation operates in the frequency domain via the short-time Fourier transform. The inputs to the DNN consisted of the separated real and imaginary components (i.e. in-phase and quadrature components) observed across the aperture of the array, at a single frequency and for a single depth. Different networks were trained for different frequencies. The output had the same structure as the input and the real and imaginary components were combined as complex data before an inverse short-time Fourier transform was used to reconstruct channel data. Using simulation, physical phantom experiment, and in vivo scans from a human liver, we compared this DNN approach to standard delay-and-sum (DAS) beamforming and an adaptive imaging technique that uses the coherence factor (CF). For a simulated point target, the side lobes when using the DNN approach were about 60 dB below those of standard DAS. For a simulated anechoic cyst, the DNN approach improved contrast ratio (CR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratio by 8.8 dB and 0.3 dB, respectively, compared to DAS. For an anechoic cyst in a physical phantom, the DNN approach improved CR and CNR by 17.1 dB and 0.7 dB, respectively. For two in vivo scans, the DNN approach improved CR and CNR by 13.8 dB and 9.7 dB, respectively. We also explored methods for examining how the networks in this work function.
Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques that parameterize the backscattered power spectrum have demonstrated significant promise for ultrasonic tissue characterization. Some QUS parameters, such as the effective scatterer diameter (ESD), require the assumption that the examined medium contains uniform diffuse scatterers. Structures that invalidate this assumption can significantly affect the estimated QUS parameters and decrease performance when classifying disease. In this work, a method was developed to reduce the effects of echoes that invalidate the assumption of diffuse scattering. To accomplish this task, backscattered signal sections containing non-diffuse echoes were identified and removed from the QUS analysis. Parameters estimated from the generalized spectrum (GS) and the Rayleigh SNR parameter were compared for detecting data blocks with non-diffuse echoes. Simulations and experiments were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the method. Experiments consisted of estimating QUS parameters from spontaneous fibroadenomas in rats and from beef liver samples. Results indicated that the method was able to significantly reduce or eliminate the effects of non-diffuse echoes that might exist in the backscattered signal. For example, the average reduction in the relative standard deviation of ESD estimates from simulation, rat fibroadenomas, and beef liver samples were 13%, 30%, and 51%, respectively. The Rayleigh SNR parameter performed best at detecting non-diffuse echoes for the purpose of removing and reducing ESD bias and variance. The method provides a means to improve the diagnostic capabilities of QUS techniques by allowing separate analysis of diffuse and non-diffuse scatterers.
Impedance maps (ZMs) have been proposed as a tool for modeling acoustic properties of tissue microstructure. Three-dimensional (3D) ZMs are constructed from a series of adjacent histological tissue slides that have been stained to emphasize acoustic impedance structures. The power spectrum of a 3DZM can be related to the ultrasound backscatter coefficient, which can be further reduced to a form factor. The goal of this study is to demonstrate the ability to estimate form factors using two-dimensional (2D) ZMs instead of 3DZMs, which have reduced computational and financial cost. The proposed method exploits the properties of isotropic media to estimate the correlation coefficient from slices before estimating the 3D volume power spectrum. Simulated sparse collections of objects were used to study the method by comparing the results obtained using 2DZMs to those predicted by theory. 2DZM analysis was conducted on normal rabbit liver histology and compared to 3DZM analysis of the same histology. The mean percent error between effective scatterer diameter estimates from 2DZMs and 3DZMs of rabbit liver histology was <10% when using three 2DZMs. The results suggest that 2DZMs are a feasible alternative to 3DZMs when estimating form factors for sparse collections of objects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.