Pediatric patients awaiting heart transplant face high mortality rates due to donor organ shortages, including non-use of marginal donor hearts. We examined national trends in pediatric marginal donor heart use over time. UNOS data were queried for heart donors <18 years from 2005 to 2014. The proportion of donor hearts considered marginal was determined using previously cited marginal characteristics: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%, use of ≥2 inotropes, cerebrovascular death, CDC high-risk status, and eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m . Disposition of donor hearts was determined and stratified by marginal donor status. Of 6778 pediatric hearts offered from 2005 to 2014, 2373 (35.0%) were considered marginal. Non-use of marginal donor hearts was significantly higher than that of donor hearts without any marginal characteristics (59.5% vs 20.3%, P < .001). In particular, LVEF < 50% and donor inotropes were associated with high rates of organ non-use among pediatric donors. Yet, non-use of marginal donor organs decreased from 67% to 48% from 2005 to 2014 (P < .001). Although the proportion of pediatric donor hearts used for pediatric patients has increased, more than half of donor hearts are declined for use in pediatric recipients due, in part, to perceived marginal status.

No abstract

Few studies compared people with knee OA and healthy controls, but those that did showed that people with knee OA performed significantly worse. More research is needed to understand the extent of balance impairments in people with knee OA using easy-to-administer, clinically available tests.

Residents of long-term care (LTC) homes have suffered disproportionately during the Covid-19 pandemic, from the virus itself and often from the imposition of lockdown measures. Provincial Geriatrics Leadership Ontario, in collaboration with interRAI and the International Federation on Aging, hosted a virtual Town Hall on September 25 2020. The purpose of this event was to bring together international perspectives from researchers, clinicians, and policy experts to address important themes potentially amenable to timely policy interventions. This manuscript summarizes these themes and the ensuing discussions among 130 attendees from 5 continents. The disproportionate impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on frail residents of LTC homes reflects a systematic lack of equitable prioritization by health system decision-makers around the world. The primary risk factors for an outbreak in a LTC home were outbreaks in the surrounding community, high staff and visitor traffic in large facilities, and crowding of residents in ageing buildings. Infection control measures must be prioritized in LTC homes, though care must be taken to protect frail and vulnerable residents from their overly blunt application that deprives residents from appropriate physical and psychosocial support. Staffing, in terms of overall numbers, training, and leadership skills, was inadequate. The built environment of LTC homes can be configured for both optimal resident well-being and infection control. Infection control and resident wellness need not be mutually exclusive. Improving outcomes for LTC residents requires more staffing with proper training and interprofessional leadership. All these initiatives must be underpinned by an effective quality assurance system based on standardized, comprehensive, accessible, and clinically relevant data, and which can support broad communities of practice capable of effecting real and meaningful change for frail older persons, wherever they chose to reside.