Mental health claims in the workplace are rising, particularly those due to depression. Associated with this is an increase in disability costs for the employer and the disability insurer, but even more important is the human suffering that results. While treatments are available for the depression there is a gap in interventions that specifically target return-to-work preparation. This paper presents cognitive work hardening, a treatment intervention that can bridge this gap by addressing the unique functional issues inherent in depression with a view to increasing return-to-work success. Cognitive work hardening applies the proven principles of classical work hardening (which has typically been applied to people with physical injuries) to the mental health domain. This paper explains how the occupational therapy principle of occupation and the core competency, enablement, are utilized and applied in cognitive work hardening. Key skills of the occupational therapist are also discussed. In addition, the paper considers the relationship of cognitive work hardening to recovery and mental illness, and the role it plays among workplace-based return-to-work interventions in the current movement toward non-clinical return-to-work interventions.

Findings underscore an occupationally focused return-to-work intervention for people recovering from depression with potential for wider adoption and future research.

BACKGROUND: Workplace mental health disability claims are rising with concomitant challenges to return-to-work (RTW) success. Cognitive work hardening (CWH) addresses work re-entry issues including fatigue, coping skills, and reduced cognitive abilities which are relevant for people returning to work following an episode of depression. OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into underlying factors contributing to CWH's effectiveness in RTW preparation following depression.METHODS: Twenty-one individuals on paid disability leave due to depression completed a four week CWH treatment intervention prior to returning to work. At program completion and at three months follow up, participants provided qualitative information regarding their experience of the intervention in the form of written questionnaires and interviews. Data were analyzed using a directed approach to content analysis. RESULTS: Intervention elements perceived by participants as helpful included structure, work simulations, and simulated work environment. Main treatment gains reported by participants related to routine, self-confidence, stamina, and cognitive abilities. Personal agency, empowerment, and skill development emerged as important consequences of interventions for RTW following depression. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings enhance understanding of CWH with relevance to clinical practice. Key intervention elements deemed important for RTW are discussed and may provide guidance for other work-re-entry programs.

The growing number of mental health disability claims and related work absences are associated with a magnitude of human, economic and social costs with profound impact on the workplace. In particular, absences due to depression are prevalent and escalating. There is a need for treatment interventions that address the unique challenges of people returning to work following an episode of depression. Occupational functioning often lags depression symptom improvement which necessitates targeted treatment. Cognitive work hardening (CWH) is a multi-element, work-oriented intervention with empirical research supporting its role in return-to-work following a depressive episode. This case report details the use of CWH to prepare an individual to return to work following a disability leave due to depression. It illustrates how CWH bridges the functional gap between being home on disability and returning to competitive employment. The client presented is a 50 year old divorced woman who had been off work for approximately 2 years for depression precipitated by the terminal illness of her mother. She participated in a 4 week CWH program which addressed fatigue and decreased stamina, reduced cognitive abilities, outdated computer skills, and heightened anxiety. Work simulations enabled the rebuilding of cognitive abilities with concomitant work stamina; task mastery bolstered self-confidence and feelings of self-efficacy; and coping skill development addressed the need for stress management and assertive communication strategies. By program completion, the client's self-reported work ability had increased and both fatigue and depression symptom severity had decreased. Clinical markers of work performance indicated that the client was ready to return to her pre-disability job. Three months after completion of CWH, the client reported that she was at work, doing well and working full days with good stamina and concentration. This report provides insight into how CWH can be applied to return-to-work preparation following depression with positive outcomes.

BackgroundMental health related work disability leaves are increasing at alarming rates with depression emerging as the most common mental disorder in the workforce. Treatments are available to alleviate depressive symptoms and associated functional impacts; however, they are not specifically aimed at preparing people to return to work. Cognitive work hardening (CWH) is a novel intervention that addresses this gap in the health care system. This paper presents a theoretical analysis of the components and underlying mechanisms of CWH using Intervention Mapping (IM) as a tool to deconstruct its elements.MethodsThe cognitive sequelae of depression and their relevance to return-to-work (RTW) are examined together with interpersonal skills and other work-related competencies that affect work ability. IM, a tool typically used to create programs, is used to deconstruct an existing program, namely CWH, into its component parts and link them to theories and models in the literature.ResultsCWH has been deconstructed into intervention elements which are linked to program performance objectives through underlying theoretical models. In this way, linkages are made between tools and materials of the intervention and the overall program objective of ‘successful RTW for people with depression’. An empirical study of the efficacy of CWH is currently underway which should provide added insight and understanding into this intervention.ConclusionsThe application of IM to CWH illustrates the theoretical underpinnings of the treatment intervention and assists with better understanding the linkage between intervention elements and intervention objective. Applying IM to deconstruct an existing program (rather than create a program) presents an alternate application of the IM tool which can have implications for other programs in terms of enhancing understanding, grounding in theoretical foundations, communicating program design, and establishing a basis for program evaluation and improvement.