Key Points• UDS demonstrated that BCR-ABL KD mutations detectable with conventional methods may just be the tip of the iceberg.• The information provided by conventional Sanger sequencing may not always be sufficient to predict responsiveness to a given TKI.In chronic myeloid leukemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy may select for drug-resistant BCR-ABL mutants. We used an ultra-deep sequencing (UDS) approach to resolve qualitatively and quantitatively the complexity of mutated populations surviving TKIs and to investigate their clonal structure and evolution over time in relation to therapeutic intervention. To this purpose, we performed a longitudinal analysis of 106 samples from 33 patients who had received sequential treatment with multiple TKIs and had experienced sequential relapses accompanied by selection of 1 or more TKI-resistant mutations. We found that conventional Sanger sequencing had misclassified or underestimated BCR-ABL mutation status in 55% of the samples, where mutations with 1% to 15% abundance were detected. A complex clonal texture was uncovered by clonal analysis of samples harboring multiple mutations and up to 13 different mutated populations were identified. The landscape of these mutated populations was found to be highly dynamic. The high degree of complexity uncovered by UDS indicates that conventional Sanger sequencing might be an inadequate tool to assess BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation status, which currently represents an important component of the therapeutic decision algorithms. Further evaluation of the clinical usefulness of UDS-based approaches is warranted. (Blood. 2013;122(9):1634-1648
Taken together, human RBCs express low but significant amounts of PrP(C) /cell, which makes them, due to high RBC numbers, major contributors to the pool of cell-associated PrP(C) in blood. Previous reports utilizing MoAb 3F4 may have underestimated the amount of PrP(C) in RBCs. Likewise, screening tests for the presence of the abnormal prion protein in blood may be difficult if the abnormal protein is modified similar to RBC PrP(C).
Using the layer-by-layer technique, ELISA polystyrene plates were coated with multilayer assemblies of albumin with various heparins or with multilayer assemblies of albumin. The coatings containing heparin were tested for their ability to potentiate thrombin inhibition by antithrombin and its dependence on the layer arrangement. The order of activities of surface bound heparins matched their order in solution; however their activity was reduced to less than 10% due to binding. The increasing number of layers increased the activity of the coatings suggesting that heparin inside the assemblies is available for the interaction. The albumin-heparin assemblies overcoated with albumin layers preserved about half of heparin activity. Platelets adhered in similar amounts to albumin-heparin and albumin coatings; however, in both cases platelets adhered more to single layer than to multilayer coatings. The adhesion of platelets to single layer coatings was also affected by the crosslinking of the coatings; more platelets adhered to less crosslinked single layer coatings while multilayer coatings remained essentially unaffected by crosslinking. If the coatings were dried and reswollen, a substantial number of platelets adhered to the reconditioned single layer coatings but the two layer coatings were affected much less and the adhesion of platelets to the coatings with three layers was close to normal. A minimum of three albumin-heparin or albumin layers is apparently required to shield the underlying surface and to achieve proper functioning of the coatings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.