Background
Bleeding after low-risk invasive procedures can be life-threatening or can lead to further complications in decompensated cirrhosis patients. In unstratified cohorts of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis, the rate of procedure-related bleeding is low despite abnormal coagulation parameters. Our objective was to identify patients with decompensated cirrhosis at a high risk of developing procedure-related bleeding in whom the value of pre-procedure transfusions could be assessed.
Methods
Hospitalized patients with cirrhosis who developed post-paracentesis hemoperitoneum confirmed by CT scan, from the period of January 2012 to August 2016, constituted the study group. They were compared to patients hospitalized in the same period in whom post-paracentesis hemoperitoneum was suspected but ruled out by CT scan. A retrospective chart review was conducted to determine specifics of the adverse event, patient characteristics and risk factors for bleeding.
Results
On multivariate analysis, acute kidney injury prior to paracentesis was the only independent predictor of post-paracentesis hemoperitoneum (OR 4.3, 95% CI 1.3–13.5, P = .01), independent of MELD score, large volume paracentesis, sepsis, platelets, INR and haemoglobin levels.
Conclusions
Infection/sepsis is generally considered predictive of bleeding in cirrhosis. Our study suggests that acute kidney injury, and not sepsis, is the most important predictor of post-procedure bleeding in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Although end-stage renal disease is a known cause of bleeding in non-cirrhotic patients, there are no studies establishing acute kidney injury as a risk factor for post-procedure bleeding in cirrhosis. Future studies investigating blood product transfusion needs in cirrhosis prior to procedures should carefully look at patients with acute kidney injury.
CAM is prevalent among patients attending a GI clinic, particularly among women and those who are dissatisfied with conventional therapies and "wish to feel better." Greater awareness and understanding of CAM among GI physicians is necessary.
Previous evaluation of total aortic calcium score suggests that mutations promoting ascending aortic aneurysm development may protect against atherosclerosis. However, calcium score is a late indicator of atherosclerosis. We evaluated carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), an earlier marker, to assess the degree of atherosclerosis in ascending aortic aneurysm patients compared to controls. Images of right and left common carotid arteries were obtained in 52 patients with ascending aortic aneurysms and 29 controls using a Sonosite MicroMaxx ultrasound. IMT was measured with Sonosite Sonocalc IMT software, a computer-based algorithm with manual override. Six IMT measurements were obtained for each patient (right and left proximal, mid and distal common carotid artery) by a single observer and averaged. A multiple linear regression analysis was applied to test for an association between aneurysm and IMT. Patients with ascending aortic aneurysms had 0.131-mm lower carotid IMT values than controls (p = 0.0002), independent of risk factors for atherosclerosis (age, BMI, gender, family history, smoking, dyslipidemia, race, diabetes and hypertension). The average IMT was 0.50 ± 0.13 mm for individuals with aneurysm and 0.60 ± 0.11 mm for controls. Age increased the IMT by 0.005 mm per year (p = 0.0003). BMI, male gender, positive family history, dyslipidemia, diabetes and hypertension also increased the IMT, but did not reach statistical significance. This investigation provides further evidence that ascending aortic aneurysm provides protection against the development of atherosclerosis, supporting the hypothesis that proaneurysmal genetic mutations may also be antiatherogenic.
Colonoscopy with moderate sedation is a low-risk procedure, and the addition of EtCO2 did not improve safety or patient satisfaction but did increase cost. These data suggest that routine capnography in this setting may not be cost effective and that EtCO2 might be reserved for patients at higher risk of adverse events.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.