Objectives To assess the diagnostic performances of chest CT for triage of patients in multiple emergency departments during COVID-19 epidemic, in comparison with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. Method From March 3 to April 4, 2020, 694 consecutive patients from three emergency departments of a large university hospital, for which a hospitalization was planned whatever the reasons, i.e., COVID-or non-COVID-related, underwent a chest CT and one or several RT-PCR tests. Chest CTs were rated as "Surely COVID+," "Possible COVID+," or "COVID−" by experienced radiologists. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using the final RT-PCR test as standard of reference. The delays for CT reports and RT-PCR results were recorded and compared. Results Among the 694 patients, 287 were positive on the final RT-PCR exam. Concerning the 694 chest CT, 308 were rated as "Surely COVID+", 34 as "Possible COVID+," and 352 as "COVID−." When considering only the "Surely COVID+" CT as positive, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV reached 88.9%, 90.2%, 88%, 84.1%, and 92.7%, respectively, with respect to final RT-PCR test. The mean delay for CT reports was three times shorter than for RT-PCR results (187 ± 148 min versus 573 ± 327 min, p < 0.0001). Conclusion During COVID-19 epidemic phase, chest CT is a rapid and most probably an adequately reliable tool to refer patients requiring hospitalization to the COVID+ or COVID− hospital units, when response times for virological tests are too long. Key Points • In a large university hospital in Lyon, France, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of chest CT for COVID-19 reached 88.9%, 90.2%, 88%, 84.1%, and 92.7%, respectively, using RT-PCR as standard of reference.

This prospective study aimed to assess the incidence of silent hypersensitivity to Escherichia coli asparaginase in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Thirty-three children with newly diagnosed ALL were included in the study and treated according to the FRALLE 2000 protocol. The 'A group' (n = 18) differed from the 'B-T group' (n = 15) by a less intensive chemotherapy, the absence of concurrent prednisone therapy, and different asparaginase administration modalities during the second intensification. Asparagine, asparaginase activity, and anti-asparaginase antibodies were measured in each phase before the next injection of asparaginase. Eighteen percent of children presented a silent hypersensitivity. Most of them were in the 'B-T group' (p = 0.07), and maintained low antibody titers throughout the treatment. Clinical hypersensitivity was statistically more frequent in group A (p = 0.002), and allergy occurred mainly during the second intensification when antibody concentrations were significantly increased. We did not find any significant difference between asparaginase activity or asparagine depletion between the silent hypersensitivity and clinical allergy groups. In all, the results of this study suggest that chemotherapy and corticosteroid therapy associated with asparaginase treatment can lower antibody production and contribute to maintaining a silent hypersensitivity state.

BackgroundProduction of high levels of IL-6 is often correlated with resistance to cytotoxics or ionizing radiations, in cancer cell lines as in various cancer patients. We investigated whether monoclonal antibodies directed against IL-6 may enable to reverse resistance of cancer cell lines.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe exposed ten haematological cancer cells from lymphoma, myeloma, or leukemia origins to cytotoxics or ionizing radiations and assessed the effects of anti–IL-6 antibody addition on cell proliferation, apoptosis, or IL-6 signaling. A strong correlation between IL-6 secretion, measured by ELISA, and resistance to doxorubicin as ionizing radiations was observed in the multiple myeloma U266 and the Burkitt's lymphoma Daudi and Namalwa cells. Although an anti–IL-6 antibody combined to both treatments efficiently blocked IL-6 signaling in U266 cells, expressing the IL-6 receptor gp80, it did not increase treatment-induced anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects on these cells, as well as on Daudi and Namalwa cells. This lack of effect could be related to diverse factors: 1) a higher release of the soluble form of IL-6 receptor gp80 in response to doxorubicin and irradiation from all cell lines, 2) an impaired level of the IL-6 pathway inhibitor SOCS3 in Daudi cells, and 3) an increased release of IL-10 and TNFα, two cytokines involved in cell radio- and chemoresistance.Conclusions/SignificanceThese data support the fact that IL-6 is not the preponderant actor of cell resistance to cytotoxics and ionizing radiations, which seems to be regulated by a complex network of proteins.