Background: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used to treat cardiogenic shock. However, VA-ECMO might hamper myocardial recovery. The Impella unloads the left ventricle. The aim of this study was to evaluate if left ventricular unloading in cardiogenic shock patients treated with VA-ECMO was associated with lower mortality. Methods: Data from 686 consecutive patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO with or without left ventricular unloading (using an Impella) at 16 tertiary-care centers in 4 countries were collected. The association between left ventricular unloading and 30-day mortality was assessed by Cox regression models in a 1:1 propensity-score-matched cohort. Results: Left ventricular unloading was used in 337 of the 686 patients (49%). After matching, 255 patients with left ventricular unloading were compared with 255 patients without left ventricular unloading. In the matched cohort, left ventricular unloading was associated with lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.63-0.98, p=0.03) without differences in various subgroups. Complications occurred more frequently in patients with left ventricular unloading; e.g. severe bleeding in 98 (38.4%) vs. 45 (17.9%), access-site related ischemia in 55 (21.6%) vs. 31 (12.3%), abdominal compartment in 23 (9.4%) vs. 9 (3.7%) and renal replacement therapy in 148 (58.5%) vs. 99 (39.1%). Conclusions: In this international, multicenter cohort study, left ventricular unloading was associated with lower mortality in cardiogenic shock patients treated with VA-ECMO, despite higher complication rates. These findings support use of left ventricular unloading in cardiogenic shock patients treated with VA-ECMO and call for further validation, ideally in a randomized, controlled trial.

No abstract

Background A decline in hospitalization for cardiovascular events and catheter laboratory activation was reported for the United States and Italy during the initial stage of the Covid-19 pandemic of 2020. We report on the deployment of emergency services for cardiovascular events in a defined region in western Germany during the government-imposed lock-down period. Methods We examined 5799 consecutive patients who were treated by emergency services for cardiovascular events during the Covid-19 pandemic (January 1 to April 30, 2020), and compared those to the corresponding time frame in 2019. Examining the emergency physicians’ records provided by nine locations in the area, we found a 20% overall decline in cardiovascular admissions. Results The greatest reduction could be seen immediately following the government-imposed social restrictions. This reduction was mainly driven by a reduction in discretionary admissions for dizziness/syncope (-53%), heart failure (-38%), exacerbated COPD (-28%) and unstable angina (-23%), while unavoidable admissions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and stroke were unchanged. There was a greater decline in emergency admissions for patients ≥60 years. There was also a greater reduction in emergency admissions for those living in urban areas compared to suburban areas. Conclusions During the Covid-19 pandemic, a significant decline in hospitalization for cardiovascular events was observed during the government-enforced shutdown in a predefined area in western Germany. This reduction in admissions was mainly driven by “discretionary” cardiovascular events (unstable angina, heart failure, exacerbated COPD and dizziness/syncope), but events in which admission was unavoidable (CPR, STEMI and stroke) did not change.

The probability of CBDS was observed to be high in the intermediate and high risk groups. However due to low sensitivity and specificity values, the ASGE guideline needs additional or different predictors.

Background: Optimal plaque preparation of calcified coronary lesions is key to prevent stent failure. The purpose of this study was to determine the strategy success and safety of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in calcified lesions of an all-comers cohort. Methods: Patients with calcified coronary lesions were screened in 3 centers. Seventy-one patients were eligible for IVL. Patients were assigned to (group A) primary IVL therapy for patients with calcified de-novo lesions (n=39 lesions), (group B) secondary IVL therapy for patients with calcified lesions in which noncompliant balloon dilatation failed (n=22 lesions), and (group C) tertiary IVL therapy in patients with stent underexpansion after previous stenting (n=17 lesions). Primary end point was strategy success (stent expansion with <20% in-stent residual stenosis) and safety outcomes (procedural complications, in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular event). Results: Seventy-eight calcified lesions were treated using the Shockwave C 2 balloon. Mean diameter stenosis of calcified lesions was 71.8±13.1% at baseline, decreased to 45.1±17.4% immediately after IVL, and to 17.5±15.2% after stenting. Mean minimal lumen diameter was 1.01±0.49 mm at baseline and increased to 1.90±0.61 after IVL, and to 2.88±0.56 mm after stenting. The primary end point of strategy success was reached in 84.6% (group A), 77.3% (group B), and 64.7% (group C). Device delivery and IVL treatment were possible in all lesions. Four type b dissections were observed without further sequelae. No patient suffered from in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular event. Seven Shockwave balloons ruptured during treatment without any sequelae. Conclusions: IVL provides a valid strategy for lesion preparation in severely calcified coronary lesions with high success rate, low procedural complications, and low major adverse cardiovascular event rates.