Preoperative manual detorsion was associated with improved surgical salvage in patients with testicular torsion.

PurposeTo investigate the roles of age, testicular rotation and time in the surgical outcome of intravaginal testicular torsion (iTT).Patients and MethodsWe retrieved the records of all iTT patients treated in our unit from January 2012 to January 2014. Explanatory variables were: age (years); presentation delay (PrD, time between symptoms and hospitalization); surgical delay (SurgD, time between hospitalization and surgery) and testicular rotation (rotation), with surgical outcome (orchidopexy, orchidectomy) as response variable. Differences in PrD, SurgD, age and rotation by surgical outcome were evaluated non-parametrically. Step-down logistic regression included age, PrD, SurgD and rotation as predictors. Statistical significance and confidence intervals (CI) were set at p<0.05 and 0.95. Odds ratios (OR) were computed from the model's coefficients.ResultsComplete variable information was available for 117 patients, and most (61, 52.1%) underwent orchidectomy. Ages were similar between orchidectomy and orchidopexy patients (median 15.8 vs. 16.0 years, p=0.78). In contrast, PrD (85.0 vs. 8.4 hours, p<0.001), SurgD (3.0 vs. 16.0 hours, p<0.001) were different between orchidectomy and orchidopexy patients. SurgD was similar with PrD<24 hours (4.0 vs. 2.8, p=0.1). Orchidectomy patients had greater rotation (3.0π vs. 2.0π radians, p<0.001). Logistic regression revealed that PrD (OR 0.94; 0.92–0.97; p<0.001) and rotation (OR 0.43; 0.27–0.70; p<0.001) were inversely associated with orchidopexy.ConclusionTesticular rotation exerts a multiplicative effect on PrD, so time should not be regarded as the sole predictor of surgical outcome in iTT.

The aim of the study was to assess organ salvage in testicular torsion patients submitted to manual detorsion according to interhospital transfer and surgical wait times.Methods: Retrospective analysis of consecutive surgically treated testicular torsion patients between 2012 and 2018. We compared testicular surgical salvage in testicular torsion patients submitted to manual detorsion either at clinical diagnosis (immediate detorsion) or after interhospital transfer from lower level-of-care facilities (delayed detorsion) and estimated the influence of interhospital transfer and surgical wait times on outcomes. Analysis included Bayesian logistic regression after propensity score matching. We excluded patients first examined at off-state and private facilities, with prediagnostic time of more than 24 hours, not initially diagnosed with testicular torsion or not submitted to manual detorsion at any time.Results: One hundred sixty-two patients (median age, 15.8 years) fulfilled inclusion criteria. The median prediagnostic, transfer, and surgical wait times were respectively 4.9, 2.4, and 4.3 hours, with 58 patients undergoing immediate and 104 delayed detorsion. Propensity score matching for prediagnostic and surgical wait times paired 58 immediate with 40 delayed detorsion patients, with corresponding surgical salvage rates of 54/58 (93%) and 33/40 (82%). Forty-seven patients (29%) still had torsion at surgery. Transfer time was inversely associated with testicular salvage, with median 13% greater probability of an unfavorable outcome for each hour of transfer time. Similarly, each hour of surgical wait time decreased surgical salvage by 6%.Conclusions: Immediate detorsion led to improved surgical outcomes in testicular torsion patients. Because of residual torsion, surgery for detorsed patients should not be postponed.

Purpose: To estimate statewide presentation delay, misdiagnosis rate, inter-hospital transfer times and testicular salvage for testicular torsion patients treated in our state's public health system. Patients and Methods: Case series of consecutive testicular torsion patients treated in our state's public health system between 2012-2018. Predictors included presentation delay (time from symptoms to first medical assessment), facilitie's level-of-care (primary, secondary, tertiary), first diagnosis (torsion, epididymitis, other), Doppler-enhanced ultrasound request (Doppler-US) and inter-hospital transfer times, with surgical organ salvage as the main response. We used Bayesian regression to estimate the effect of first examining facilitie's level-of-care, first diagnosis, and Doppler-US on transfer time. Results: 505 patients were included, most (298, 59%) with presentation delay >6 hours. Misdiagnosis at first examining facility raised transfer time from median 2.8 to 23.4 (epididymitis) and 37.9 hours (other) and lowered testicular salvage rates from 60.3% (torsion) to 10.7% (epididymitis) and 18.3% (other). Doppler-US had negligible effects on transfer time once controlling for misdiagnosis in the regression model. Although organ salvage in patients presenting before 6 hours at the tertiary facility was high (94.6%, and about 20% lower for those presenting at lower levels-of-care), the overall salvage rate was more modest (46%). Conclusion: Our low overall testicular salvage rates originated from a large proportion of late presentations combined with long transfer times caused by frequent misdiagnoses. Our results indicate that efforts to improve salvage rates should aim at enhancing populationwide disease awareness and continuously updating physicians working at primary and secondary levels-of-care about scrotal emergencies.