The process of evaluating potential donors in liver transplantation is important to ensure donor safety and provide optimal recipient outcomes. However, there has been no report about donor exclusion rates and reasons for such exclusion in Korea. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the outcomes of potential living liver donor evaluation in a major living donor liver transplantation center. From July 2011 to June 2015, prospectively collected data of 726 potential donors for 588 matched recipients were subsequently evaluated. Among 726 potential donors, 374 potential donors (51.5%) finally reached donation; 352 potential donors (48.5%) were excluded for various reasons. Donor reasons were 29.8%, including medical problems, withdrawal of consent, graft volume issues, and identification of a better suitable donor. Recipient reasons were 20.7%, including recipient death or recovery, allocation to deceased donor, and progressions of hepatocellular carcinoma. A total of 38 (5.2%) potential donors had a fatty liver. Among them, 15 (39.5%) potential donors tried short-term weight reduction and eventually were able to donate. In conclusion, the main reasons for donor exclusion were medical problems and withdrawal of consent. Therefore, thorough medical screening and careful examination for donor voluntarism are important in the donor evaluation process. Liver Transplantation 23 614-624 2017 AASLD.

Digestive surgery service including surgical management of gastrointestinal disease and digestive cancers are experiencing the impact of COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore it is necessary to formulate recommendation for digestives surgery service, as guidelines to engage in case-by-case assessment of particular patients with digestive diseases. We are aware that the knowledge and science of COVID-19 are still evolving, with new progression every day. This recommendation reflect actual condition and are subject for future adjustment in the future.

No abstract

No abstract

The incidence of combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) in a single patient accounts for only 0.4 to 14% of all primary liver cancer. However, the prognosis of its intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) component is poor. We experienced a unique case of a sequentially developed cHCC-CC with adrenal metastasis as the primary presentation and a hidden primary hepatocellular carcinoma. A 65-year-old female with a history of jaundice and abdominal discomfort was diagnosed with S4 ICC measuring 5 cm in diameter, and characterized histologically as papillary adenocarcinoma with intraductal growth, but without any evidence of malignant hepatocyte. S4 segmentectomy with hepaticojejunostomy revealed no additional masses. A follow-up CT scan 3 months after surgery showed a right adrenal mass with markedly increased serum AFP (4950 ng/mL), which was treated with right adrenalectomy. Histopathology revealed a metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma testing positive for AFP, glypican-3, and hepatocytes, but negative for CD-10, inhibin-α, EMA, S-100, and cytokeratin-7. Serum AFP level immediately plummeted to 4.1 ng/mL upon adrenal mass removal. A recurrent S7 liver mass was suspected 1 year later with serum AFP value of 7.6 ng/mL, and characteristic CT imaging of HCC. TACE was performed with good response. Adrenal metastasis may manifest as the primary focus of hepatocellular carcinoma in sequentially developed cHCC-CC patients with hidden primary HCC. cHCC-CC should be considered in the differential diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma with elevated AFP.