BackgroundTo ensure high quality patient care an effective interprofessional collaboration between healthcare professionals is required. Interprofessional education (IPE) has a positive impact on team work in daily health care practice. Nevertheless, there are various challenges for sustainable implementation of IPE. To identify enablers and barriers of IPE for medical and nursing students as well as to specify impacts of IPE for both professions, the ‘Cooperative academical regional evidence-based Nursing Study in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania’ (Care-N Study M-V) was conducted. The aim is to explore, how IPE has to be designed and implemented in medical and nursing training programs to optimize students’ impact for IPC.MethodsA qualitative study was conducted using the Delphi method and included 25 experts. Experts were selected by following inclusion criteria: (a) ability to answer every research question, one question particularly competent, (b) interdisciplinarity, (c) sustainability and (d) status. They were purposely sampled. Recruitment was based on existing collaborations and a web based search.ResultsThe experts find more enablers than barriers for IPE between medical and nursing students. Four primary arguments for IPE were mentioned: (1) development and promotion of interprofessional thinking and acting, (2) acquirement of shared knowledge, (3) promotion of beneficial information and knowledge exchange, and (4) promotion of mutual understanding. Major barriers of IPE are the coordination and harmonization of the curricula of the two professions. With respect to the effects of IPE for IPC, experts mentioned possible improvements on (a) patient level and (b) professional level. Experts expect an improved patient-centered care based on better mutual understanding and coordinated cooperation in interprofessional health care teams. To sustainably implement IPE for medical and nursing students, IPE needs endorsement by both, medical and nursing faculties.ConclusionIn conclusion, IPE promotes interprofessional cooperation between the medical and the nursing profession. Skills in interprofessional communication and roles understanding will be primary preconditions to improve collaborative patient-centered care. The impact of IPE for patients and caregivers as well as for both professions now needs to be more specifically analysed in prospective intervention studies.
Background:Older people have a higher risk of drug-related problems (DRPs). However, little is
known about the prevalence of DRPs in community-dwelling people who screened positive
for dementia. Our study aimed to determine (1) the prevalence and types of DRPs and (2)
the socio-demographic and clinical variables associated with DRPs in people screened
positive for dementia in primary care.Methods:The Dementia: life- and person-centered help in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania
(DelpHi-MV) study is a general practitioner (GP)-based cluster-randomized controlled
intervention study to implement and evaluate an innovative concept of collaborative
dementia care management in the primary care setting in Germany. Medication reviews of
446 study participants were conducted by pharmacists based on a comprehensive baseline
assessment that included a computer-based home medication assessment. ClinicalTrials.gov
Identifier: NCT01401582.Results:A total of 1,077 DRPs were documented. In 414 study participants (93%), at least one
DRP was detected by a pharmacist. The most frequent DRPs were administration and
compliance problems (60%), drug interactions (17%), and problems with inappropriate drug
choice (15%). The number of DRPs was significantly associated with the total number of
drugs taken and with a formal diagnosis of a mental or behavioral disorder.Conclusions:Degree of cognitive impairment (MMSE defined) and formal diagnosis of dementia were not
risk factors for an increased number of DRPs. However, the total number of drug taken
and the presence of a diagnosis of mental and behavioral disorders were associated with
an increased total number of DRPs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.