Objective To investigate whether perceived opinions of primary care are associated with student career preferences after graduation among a rural clinical school cohort and whether the preferred location of practice moderates these relationships. Design Cross‐sectional study using data from the national Federation of Rural Australian Medical Educators survey. Participants/Setting Medical students across 18 Australian universities who completed a clinical year in a rural setting in 2019. Main outcome measure(s) Career preference in primary care after graduation. Results The survey was completed by 624 students (response rate = 69.9%). A preference for primary care was reported by 35.5% (95% CI: 29.4‐42.0) of students and was more likely among those age 30+ years, with a rural background, or preferring to practise rurally after graduation. Students reported that primary care was more commonly respected by medical academics (66.8%) than peers (24.0%) or junior/hospital doctors (24.0%). In adjusted analysis, none of the perceived opinions were associated with student career preferences. However, among students aiming to work in small rural locations, a career in primary care was associated with more frequent reports that peers had poor opinions of primary care (P = .004). Conclusion Rural clinical school students perceive negative opinions of primary care, particularly among peers and junior/hospital doctors. Students aiming to work in small towns after graduation are more likely to report negative opinions among their peers, suggesting they may be more attuned to negative attitudes. This points to the need for a community of practice of like‐minded peers and clinicians to preserve the career interest of these students.

Introduction: Access to ultrasound imaging services is limited in rural areas and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has the potential to address this gap. We aimed to examine how POCUS is utilised by doctors in contemporary Australian rural general practice.Methods: A portable ultrasound machine and access to a training course were provided to four general practices in rural South Australia, and the type and frequency of POCUS scans were recorded, along with user information, between July 2020 and June 2021. Participating general practitioners (GPs) completed a survey at the commencement of the study regarding their previous experience and confidence in using POCUS for specific assessments and procedures.Results: Of the 472 scans recorded, most (95%) were for clinical indications, 3% for teaching activities and 2% for self-learning.Overall, 69% were obstetric scans, followed by abdominal (12%), gynaecological procedures (10%), other procedural (7%) and thoracic exams (1.5%). Users reported higher confidence for lower complexity POCUS. Conclusion:Although POCUS has diverse potential applications in rural practice, GPs reported limited confidence for certain scans and used POCUS predominantly for obstetric indications. Further studies should examine the barriers to POCUS utilisation, with particular attention to training requirements, reimbursement for use and access to machines.