Background: Studies have shown that intravenous methadone intraoperatively can reduce opioid usage postoperatively. Objective: This study’s purpose was to evaluate the effect of intravenous methadone on postoperative opioid use. Methods: A prospective, single-center observational study was conducted to evaluate patients who received intravenous methadone intraoperatively. A control group was identified by matching procedure, gender, and age in a 1:3 ratio of methadone to control. Exclusion criteria included patients less than 18 years old or on methadone maintenance therapy. The primary outcome was morphine milligram equivalents (MME) administered 24h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included MME administered 48h and 72h postoperatively, discharge prescription MME, daily mean postoperative pain scores, and length of hospital stay. A subgroup analysis was performed comparing opioid-naïve patients. Results: A total of 240 patients were included in the analysis. At 24h, postoperative MME was increased in the methadone group (142.6 vs 84.5; P = 0.0026). Postoperative MME was also increased in the methadone group at 48h and 72h. Daily pain scores were similar between both groups at all time intervals. Discharge prescription MME was reduced in the methadone group compared with controls, but not statistically significant. A subgroup analysis of opioid-naïve patients showed a significant reduction in MME at 48h ( P = 0.0240) and daily pain scores at 24h ( P = 0.0366) in the methadone group. Conclusion and Relevance: Intravenous methadone intraoperatively did not show a significant reduction in postoperative opioid use and discharge prescription MMEs when comparing all patients; however, benefit was seen when examining opioid-naïve patients.

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism and in-situ small vessel thrombosis are increased in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in several patient cohorts. Endotheliopathy and activation of both platelets and coagulation predict critical illness and death. For these reasons the use of anti-platelet agents and increased-intensity anticoagulation in the care of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is under intense study in several clinical trials. We sought to examine the impact of aspirin and anticoagulation on hospitalization outcomes. Methods: We examined outcomes in a large multi-site cohort of consecutive, hospitalized, COVID-19 laboratory confirmed patients under a risk-stratified treatment algorithm from March 13 through June 18, with a focus on efficacy of aspirin and/or increased-intensity anticoagulation. Out of 4150 identified hospitalized patients with COVID-19, we created 3 study cohorts. The overall cohort (2785 patients) excluded pediatric patients, those with incomplete electronic data, and those with multiple admissions. The aspirin (1956 patients) and anticoagulation (1623 patients) cohorts were nested within the overall cohort; the former excluded patients on any home anti-platelet therapy or those who received non-aspirin anti-platelet therapy in the hospital, while the latter excluded patients who did not receive prophylactic or intermediate dose anticoagulation in the hospital. The primary outcome was in-hospital death. Secondary outcomes were time-to-death with a competing risk (time-to-hospital-discharge), escalation to ICU, length-of-stay and use of mechanical ventilation. Variables examined included age, gender, BMI, race, Rothman Index (RI), D-dimer (DD) and patient co-morbidities including cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and prior VTE. The aspirin and anticoagulation cohorts underwent propensity score (PS) matching utilizing variables found to be significant in multivariable regression modeling in the overall cohort with 638 and 386 patients, respectively. Results: Univariate followed by multivariable regression modeling in the 2785 patient overall cohort established a novel role for RI, and independent roles for age, BMI, and maximum DD, in predicting severity of illness. In all cohorts the 50th and lower percentile of admission RI was predictive of mortality in multivariable modeling (i.e. aspirin: 3rd and 4th admission RI quartiles with HR = 0.18 for both, p<0.001 for both). In PS matched patients, aspirin was associated with a significant decrease in mortality (OR 0.65 [0.42, 0.98], p=0.044) and a significant increase in mechanical ventilation (OR 1.49 [1.03, 2.18], p=0.037) and ICU status (OR = 1.45 [1.06, 1.98], p=0.021). In PS matched patients in the anticoagulation cohort, intermediate versus prophylactic dose anticoagulation was associated with a marginal decrease in mortality (OR 0.60, p=0.053). In the aspirin cohort examining in-hospital death and discharge as competing risks, the use of aspirin was associated with decreased mortality (p=0.042) and had no effect on discharge (p=0.31). In the anticoagulation cohort a similar competing risk model showed the use of intermediate rather than prophylactic anticoagulation decreased mortality (p=0.046) and had no effect on discharge (p = 0.21). Conclusion: We show in a large cohort of consecutively hospitalized patients with COVID-19 treated under a risk-stratified algorithm the prognostic utility of the admission RI in assessing outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and a potential benefit of aspirin therapy on in-hospital death from COVID-19. A potential albeit marginal benefit of intermediate dose anticoagulation over prophylactic dose anticoagulation merits further study with results of clinical trials awaited. Figure Disclosures Neuberg: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Celgene: Research Funding.

Introduction: Insulin is commonly prescribed to manage early post-kidney transplant hyperglycemia due to its flexibility. Studies comparing the effectiveness of oral therapies on glycemic outcomes remain limited. Project aims: The purpose of this program evaluation was to analyze our experience using oral antiglycemic agents immediately post-kidney transplant, compared to patients managed with insulin monotherapy. Design: This was a single-center, retrospective review of adult kidney transplant recipients with new or worsening hyperglycemia between 01/2014-05/2020. Patients were excluded if they had a prior or combined organ transplant, type 1 diabetes, or were previously on intensive insulin. Patients discharged on oral medications were 1:1 matched to patients receiving intensive insulin based on pre-specified clinical parameters. The primary endpoint was the number of diabetes-related readmissions within 6-months of transplant. Key secondary endpoints included mean serum glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels. Results: Thirty patients prescribed oral therapies were successfully matched to patients receiving intensive insulin. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for more whites in the insulin group. There were no differences in diabetes-related (6.7% vs 3.3%; P = 1.00) or all-cause readmissions within 6-months. Mean serum glucose ( P = .99) and hemoglobin A1c ( P = .49) levels were also similar between patients receiving oral agents and insulin. However, 7 patients in the oral group were eventually converted to standing insulin. Conclusion: Our experience suggested that the early use of oral antiglycemics post-kidney transplant in select patients can result in similar outcomes relative to insulin. Meticulous follow-up is necessary as one-quarter of patients may require conversion to insulin within 1-month.

No abstract