The region of head and neck is critical for respiration, nutrition, and speech. The management of laryngeal tumours can stimulate mutilations and cosmetic deformities and worsen the life. A “non-operative approach” is preferred for patients to whom radiation following surgery, possibly, will direct severe functional destruction predominantly in advanced stage patients having a bulk of carcinoma larynx. The case material for the study was selected from the cross-section of patients registered at the J. K. Cancer Institute, Kanpur. Histologically squamous cell carcinoma 64 patients were registered and equally and randomly placed into Arm I and Arm II. “Arm I” patients and “Arm II” was comprised of randomly selected 64 patients, having histopathologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. All patients (32 patients) belonging to “Arm I” received concurrent chemoradiotherapy of Inj. Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 for three-weekly underwent EBRT with 60 Co/LINAC and photon radiation of 70 Gy in 35 fractions for 7 weeks (2 parallel opposed fields). All the patients (32 patients) belongs to “Arm II” received chemo boost as Inj. Cisplatin 6 mg/m2 on last 15 fractions of treatment underwent EBRT with 60 Co/ LINAC photon radiation of 70 Gy in 35 fractions for 7 weeks. Radiotherapy was delivered in supine position by parallel opposing fields including the primary tumour, disease extension, and neck nodes. The study concluded that the loco-regional responses are analogous in Arm I and Arm 2, however Arm II had additional treatment allied toxicities and resulting from numerous of treatment breaks.

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had an overwhelming impact on health care worldwide. Cancer patients represent a subgroup that is vulnerable and is under high risk. It is, therefore, necessary to analyze factors that predict outcomes in these patients so that they can be triaged accordingly to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 on cancer management. To date, the impact of COVID-19 on cancer patients remain largely unknown. Methods Data of 291 cancer patients undergoing active treatment from March 23 to August 15, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed; the incidence, demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of cancer patients infected by COVID-19 were included in the analysis. Discussion During the index period (March 23–August 15, 2020), 4,494 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were admitted at our institute. In the department of medical oncology out of 578 patients presented to outpatient department, 291 patients were admitted for active treatment. Considering the cancer patients, infection rate was 7.9% (23/291) and mortality 13% (3/23). Median age was 40 years and the majority of patients were male (60%). The most common cancer type was acute lymphoblastic leukemia presented at various stages of treatment. Twenty patients (86.9%) were discharged after full clinical recovery and negative real-time polymerase chain reaction on a nasopharyngeal swab. Anticancer treatment was modified according to the type of cancer under intensive surveillance. Conclusion Although mortality rate in COVID-19 cancer patients is elevated, our results support the feasibility and safety of continuing anticancer treatment during pandemic by endorsing consistent preventive measures, but however should be modified based on the type and prognosis of cancer.

Fever and extensive necrosis with 30% or more epidermal involvement along with mucous membrane is known as toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). It is a life-threatening mucocutaneous disease and is usually drug induced. We report a rare case of docetaxel-induced TEN. A patient with metastatic breast carcinoma received single agent docetaxel and developed severe skin and mucous membrane reaction involving more than 30% of the skin, and managed conservatively in intensive care unit but she succumbed to her illness. Although common toxicities reported with docetaxel include alopecia, nail damage, myelosuppression, and erythema multiforme major, TEN after docetaxel is very rare and can be a life-threatening complication as in our case.

No abstract

Purpose The incidence of cancer has increased in India with a visible impact on the young population (aged 15–39 years). The present study aims to evaluate psychological distress among Indian adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with solid cancer using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) distress thermometer. Methods The demographic and clinical characteristics of AYAs patients (age 15–39 years) with cancer were recorded. Assessment of psychological distress of patients using the NCCN distress thermometer was performed at three time points over a period of 3 months. Distress thermometer scale and a self-administered questionnaire in English and Hindi languages was handed over to participants at three time points: at treatment commencement (T1), at 1 month, and 3 months (T2 and T3, respectively) into therapy. Results Of the 259 patients, 63% were women and 37% men; the median age was 34 years. In total, 71 (27%) were ≤ 24 years old and 188 (73%) were>24 years old. Bone sarcoma (39%) was common cancer in AYA patients aged ≤ 24 years and breast cancer (21%) in >24 years of age. The distress scores in both the groups were the highest at diagnosis (T1) followed by that measured at 1 (T2) and 3 months (T3) after diagnosis. The distress score in the age ≤ 24 years was the highest (6.7) at T1, followed by those measured at T2 (2.6) and T3 (1.1) and among age>24 years was the highest (6.6) at T1, followed by those measured at T2 (2.6) and T3 (1.2). Among AYA patients>24 years old, worry, nervousness, sadness, transportation, and sleep were the top five identified problems and in ≤ 24 years old, the top identified problems were worry, financial support, sleep, nervousness, and sadness. Conclusion Adolescents and young adults experience some level of distress associated with the cancer diagnosis, effects of the disease, treatment regardless of the stage and various transitions throughout the trajectory of the disease. The distress thermometer is an easy and useful tool for the assessment of psychological distress in AYA cancers. Early identification of distress burden with the distress thermometer leads to effective interventions in patients with cancer which could improve outcomes including survival in AYAs with cancer in India.