10009 Background: Older adults are a growing segment of our oncology population, with an expected increase in cancer incidence of 67% from 2010 to 2030 in people age 65 and older. However, older adults have been proportionally underrepresented in clinical trials. We sought to analyze the age-related enrollment of cancer patients onto trials supporting registration of new drugs or new indications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 2005 to 2015. Methods: This study involved retrospective analyses of demographic data of cancer patients enrolled onto trials supporting registration from 2005-2015. The data on 224,766 cancer patients supporting 105 drug applications were analyzed according to age distributions of <65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, and ≥80 years. The rates of enrollment were compared with the corresponding rates in the US cancer population. The age distributions of the US cancer population were derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute for the year 2013 based on the 2010 US Census. Conclusions: Older adults were under-represented in the registration trials of new cancer therapies, especially those over age 75. Various strategies may be needed to evaluate cancer therapies for older adults in prospective clinical trials and to improve cancer care in adults over age 75. These include re-evaluating what may be considered restrictive eligibility criteria so as not to exclude older adults. Incorporating elements from geriatric assessment tools may help identify older adults most likely to benefit from treatment. More detailed labeling information that reflects the clinical experience with older adults could be considered. The FDA encourages drug sponsors as well as clinical trial cooperative groups to devise strategies to recruit patients that are reflective of their intended population. [Table: see text]

Our analysis suggests a greater DepOR is associated with longer PFS and OS for patients receiving ALKi or anti-PD1 Ab. Overall, this suggests that DepOR may provide an additional outcome measure for clinical trials, and may allow better comparisons of treatment activity.

No abstract

In July 2006 archaeologists from the University of Bristol and Atkins Heritage embarked on a contemporary archaeology project with a difference. We ‘excavated’ an old (1991) Ford Transit van, used by archaeologists and later by works and maintenance teams at the Ironbridge Museum. The object: to see what can be learnt from a very particular, common and characteristic type of contemporary place; to establish what archaeologists and archaeology can contribute to understanding the way society, and specifically we as archaeologists, use and inhabit these places; and to challenge and critique archaeologies of the contemporary past. In this report we describe our excavation and situate it within a wider debate about research practice in contemporary archaeology.

No abstract