Simultaneous acetone butanol ethanol (ABE) fermentation by Clostridium beijerinckii P260 and in situ product recovery was investigated using a vacuum process operated in two modes: continuous and intermittent. Integrated batch fermentations and ABE recovery were conducted at 37 °C using a 14-L bioreactor (7.0 L fermentation volume) containing initial substrate (glucose) concentration of 60 g/L. The bioreactor was connected in series with a condensation system and vacuum pump. Vacuum was applied continuously or intermittently with 1.5 h vacuum sessions separated by 4, 6, and 8 h intervals. A control ABE fermentation experiment was characterized by incomplete glucose utilization due to butanol toxicity to C. beijerinckii P260, while fermentation coupled with in situ recovery by both continuous and intermittent vacuum modes resulted in complete utilization of glucose, greater productivity, improved cell growth, and concentrated recovered ABE stream. These results demonstrate that vacuum technology can be applied to integrated ABE fermentation and recovery even though the boiling point of butanol is greater than that of water.

Acetone–butanol–ethanol (ABE) facilities have traditionally presented unattractive economics because of the large energy consumption during recovery of the products from a dilute fermentation broth (∼13 g/L butanol). This problem results from the high toxicity of butanol to microorganisms that catalyze its production. Flash fermentation is a continuous fermentation system with integrated product recovery. The bioreactor is operated at atmospheric pressure and the broth is circulated in a closed loop to a vacuum chamber where ABE is continuously boiled off at 37 °C and condensed afterward. With this technology the beer achieved a concentration of butanol as high as 30–37 g/L. This paper studies the energy requirements for butanol recovery using the flash fermentation technology and its effect on the energy consumption by the downstream distillation system. Compressors are used to remove the vapors from the flash tank, thus maintaining the desired vacuum. The heat recovery technique of vapor recompression is used to reduce energy requirements. With this technique the heat generated by the compression and partial condensation of the vapors provides the energy for boil up (heat of vaporization) in the flash tank. Thus the energy requirement for the flash fermentation is essentially the electrical power demanded by compressors. Energy for recirculation pumps accounts for approximately 0.5% of the total energy consumption. Small increments in butanol concentration in the beer can have important positive impacts on the energy consumption of the distillation unit. Nonetheless, the energy use of the recovery technology must be included in the energy balance. For a fermentation with a wild-type strain, the total energy requirement for butanol recovery (flash fermentation + distillation) was 17.0 MJ/kg butanol, with 36% of this value demanded by the flash fermentation. This represents a reduction of 39% in the energy for butanol recovery in relation to the conventional batch process. In the case of a fermentation with a hyper-butanol producing mutant strain, the use of the flash fermentation could reduce the energy consumption for butanol recovery by 16.8% in relation to a batch fermentation with the same mutant strain.