Conventional association of 'triphasic waves' with specific clinical conditions may lead to inaccurate EEG interpretation.

Refractory status epilepticus is defined as persistent seizures despite appropriate use of two intravenous medications, one of which is a benzodiazepine. It can be seen in up to 40% of cases of status epilepticus with an acute symptomatic etiology as the most likely cause. New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a recently coined term for refractory status epilepticus where no apparent cause is found after initial testing. A large proportion of NORSE cases are eventually found to have an autoimmune etiology needing immunomodulatory treatment. Management of refractory status epilepticus involves treatment of an underlying etiology in addition to intravenous anesthetics and antiepileptic drugs. Alternative treatment options including diet therapies, electroconvulsive therapy, and surgical resection in case of a focal lesion should be considered. Short-term and long-term outcomes tend to be poor with significant morbidity and mortality with only one-third of patients reaching baseline neurological status.

Background Generalized triphasic waves (TPWs) occur in both metabolic encephalopathies and non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). Empiric trials of benzodiazepines (BZDs) or non-sedating AED (NSAEDs) are commonly used to differentiate the two, but the utility of such trials is debated. The goal of this study was to assess response rates of such trials and investigate whether metabolic profile differences affect the likelihood of a response. Methods Three institutions within the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium retrospectively identified patients with unexplained encephalopathy and TPWs who had undergone a trial of BZD and/or NSAEDs to differentiate between ictal and non-ictal patterns. We assessed responder rates and compared metabolic profiles of responders and non-responders. Response was defined as resolution of the EEG pattern and either unequivocal improvement in encephalopathy or appearance of previously absent normal EEG patterns, and further categorized as immediate (within <2 h of trial initiation) or delayed (>2 h from trial initiation). Results We identified 64 patients with TPWs who had an empiric trial of BZD and/or NSAED. Most patients (71.9 %) were admitted with metabolic derangements and/or infection. Positive clinical responses occurred in 10/53 (18.9 %) treated with BZDs. Responses to NSAEDs occurred in 19/45 (42.2 %), being immediate in 6.7 %, delayed but definite in 20.0 %, and delayed but equivocal in 15.6 %. Overall, 22/64 (34.4 %) showed a definite response to either BZDs or NSAEDs, and 7/64 (10.9 %) showed a possible response. Metabolic differences of responders versus non-responders were statistically insignificant, except that the 48-h low value of albumin in the BZD responder group was lower than in the non-responder group. Conclusions Similar metabolic profiles in patients with encephalopathy and TPWs between responders and non-responders to anticonvulsants suggest that predicting responders a priori is difficult. The high responder rate suggests that empiric trials of anticonvulsants indeed provide useful clinical information. The more than twofold higher response rate to NSAEDs suggests that this strategy may be preferable to BZDs. Further prospective investigation is warranted.

Aims. Status epilepticus (SE) is defined as ongoing seizures lasting longer than five minutes or multiple seizures without recovery. Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are first-line agents for the management of SE. Our objective was to evaluate BZD dosing in SE patients and its effects on clinical/electrographic outcomes. Methods. A retrospective analysis was conducted from a prospective database of SE patients admitted to a university-based neurocritical care unit. The initial presentation and progression to refractory SE (RSE) and non-convulsive SE (NCSE) with coma was evaluated. Outcome measures included length of stay (LOS), rates of intubation, ventilator-dependent days, and Glasgow outcome scale (GOS). The lorazepam equivalent (LE) dosage of BZDs administered was calculated and we analysed variations in progression if 4 mg or more of LE (adequate BZDs) was administered. Results. Among 100 patients, the median dose of LE was 3 mg (IQR: 2-5 mg). Only 31% of patients received adequate BZDs. Only 18.9% of patients with NCSE without coma received adequate BZDs (p=0.04). Among patients progressing to RSE, 75.4% had not received adequate BZDs (p=0.04) and among patients developing NCSE with coma, 80.6% did not receive adequate BZDs (p=0.07). Escalating doses of BZDs were associated with a decrease in cumulative incidences of RSE (correlation coefficient r=-0.6; p=0.04) and NCSE with coma (correlation coefficient r=-0.7; p=0.003). Outcome measures were not influenced by BZD dosing. Conclusion. The majority of our patients were not adequately dosed with BZDs. Inadequate BZD dosing progressed to RSE and had a tendency to lead to NCSE with coma. Our study demonstrates the need to develop a hospital-wide protocol to guide first responders in the management of SE.