There is no consensus on the surgical management of coexisting cataract in patients who undergo glaucoma surgery. In this study, we systematically reviewed the literature to compare the efficacy and safety of phacotrabeculectomy and trabeculectomy either alone or followed by later phacoemulsification. We systematically searched the literature databases PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central. Eligible studies were comparative trials of eyes with glaucoma that underwent either phacotrabeculectomy or trabeculectomy with or without later phacoemulsification. Our primary outcome measure was intraocular pressure (IOP) control closest to 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were efficacy closest to 12 months in terms of visual acuity, visual field, prevalence of complications, needling or revision, number of antiglaucomatous medications, and surgical success. We identified 25 studies with a total of 4,749 eyes. The IOP did not differ significantly between those who underwent phacotrabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy with (MD: 0.63, CI95%: −0.32, 1.59, p = 0.19 ) or without later phacoemulsification (MD: −0.52, CI95%: −1.45, 0.40, p = 0.27 ). However, phacotrabeculectomy was associated with lower risk of complications (RR: 0.80, CI95%: 0.67, 0.95, p = 0.01 ) and better visual acuity corresponding to a 1.4-line difference (MD: −0.14, CI95%: −0.27, −0.95, p = 0.03 ) compared to trabeculectomy. Other secondary outcome measures did not differ significantly (visual field, needling or revision, number of antiglaucomatous medications, and surgical success). In conclusion, postoperative IOP is comparable, and the number of complications is lower when phacotrabeculectomy is compared to trabeculectomy with or without later phacoemulsification in patients with coexisting glaucoma and cataract. However, our study also reveals that the level of evidence is low, and randomized clinical trials are warranted.
Introduction:To compare the effect of three different anti-inflammatory regimens consisting of preservative-free dexamethasone (DEX), diclofenac (DICLO) eye drops, and their combination (DEX ? DICLO) following trabeculectomy on early postoperative inflammation. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Sixty-nine patients undergoing trabeculectomy were randomized to receive either postoperative treatment with topical DEX (n = 23), topical DICLO (n = 23), or a combination of topical DEX and topical DICLO (n = 23) after trabeculectomy. The primary outcome was the anterior chamber flare measurement in the first 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, conjunctival injection, and number of cells in the anterior chamber from baseline to 3 months postoperatively.Results: Anterior chamber flare reached a maximum 1 day after trabeculectomy with an increase of 55% (95% CI 37-73%) for DEX, 64% (95% CI 47-82%) for DICLO, and 57% (95% CI 39-75%) for DEX ? DICLO and returned to near pre-operative values 6 weeks after surgery. There were no significant differences in anterior chamber flare [effect size for DICLO: 0.16 (95% CI -4.3 to 4.6), effect size for DEX ? DICLO: 0.09 (95% CI -4.1 to 4.3)], intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, conjunctival injection, or number of cells in the anterior chamber between DEX, DICLO, or DEX ? DICLO groups. Conclusion: We found that topical diclofenac was not statistically different from topical dexamethasone in controlling early postoperative inflammation after trabeculectomy, while combining diclofenac and dexamethasone offered no added anti-inflammatory control compared to dexamethasone alone. Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04054830).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.