Background There is growing evidence that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) promotes vascular endothelial dysfunction and atherogenesis. Pathways that mediate this pathology may include Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) which play a significant role in proinflammatory processes. The aim of this study was to measure the expression of the above-mentioned receptors in relation to OSA severity in carotid plaques obtained during open endarterectomy. Methods This prospective study included patients with a sleep study prior to surgery and a plaque specimen obtained during standard open endarterectomy. Immunohistochemistry of TLR2, TLR4, TLR7, TLR9, RAGE, HMGB1, and NF-κB was performed on atherosclerotic plaques from carotid arteries of patients with and without OSA. Results There were 46 patients (22 women, mean age 73.2 ± 1.3 years): 14 control patients, 13 with mild, 11 with moderate, and 8 with severe OSA. The expression of all TLRs and RAGE increased proportionately with increasing OSA severity. The largest differences between patients with severe OSA and no OSA were found for TLR2 (2.88 ± 0.35 vs. 1.27 ± 0.47, p < 0.001), TLR4 (2.88 ± 0.35 vs. 1.64 ± 0.5, p < 0.001), TLR9 (2.38 ± 0.52 vs. 1.45 ± 0.52, p < 0.01), and RAGE (2.5 ± 0.53 vs. 1.82 ± 0.6, p < 0.05). Conclusion TLR2, TLR4, TLR9, and RAGE expression was significantly increased in carotid plaques of patients with moderateto-severe OSA when compared with control patients with no OSA and those with mild OSA. TLR and RAGE-mediated pathways may play a significant role in OSA-dependent atherogenesis.

No abstract

Background: Transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TUR) is associated with a risk of bladder perforation. The underlying mechanisms and risk factors are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine if the bladder wall structure affects the risk of bladder perforation during TUR. Methods: Fifteen patients who underwent TUR complicated by a bladder perforation (group 1) and fifteen matched controls who underwent uncomplicated TUR (group 2) were retrospectively enrolled in this morphological analysis. Surgical specimens were collected from all participating patients to describe the quality and architecture of urothelium and bladder submucosa. Immunohistochemical studies were performed with primary mouse antihuman E-cadherin, beta-catenin, type IV collagen, cytokeratin 20 and epithelial membrane antigen antibodies. The intensity of the immunohistochemical reaction was assessed using an immunoreactive score (IRS). Ultrastructural examinations were performed by transmission electron microscopy. The microscopic assessment was focused on the intensity of fibrosis in the bladder submucosa and the presence of degenerative changes in the urothelium. Results: Patients' age, sex distribution, tumour diameters, surgeon experience or cancer stage did not differ between study groups. The immunohistochemical analysis did not reveal statistically significant differences between group 1 and group 2. From a clinical point of view, ultrastructural analysis by electron microscopy showed a higher rate of severe fibrosis in group 1 (63.6% vs. 38.5%), with no differences in the rate and degree of urothelial changes. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.32). Conclusions: Bladder perforation during TUR is not a result of a deficient structure of the bladder wall. Based on available evidence, the surgical technique seems to play the most important role in its prevention.

Background Transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TUR) is associated with a risk of bladder perforation. The underlying mechanisms and risk factors are unknown. The aim of this study was to describe the quality and architecture of urothelium and bladder submucosa in patients undergoing TUR complicated by bladder perforation. Methods Fifteen patients who underwent TUR complicated by a bladder perforation were retrospectively enrolled into this morphological analysis (group 1). As a control group, 15 patients, who had undergone uncomplicated TUR, were matched (group 2). Surgical specimens were collected from all participating patients. Immunohistochemical studies were performed with primary mouse anti-human E-cadherin, beta-catenin, type IV collagen, cytokeratin 20 and epithelial membrane antigen antibodies. The intensity of the immunohistochemical reaction was assessed using an immunoreactive score (IRS). Ultrastructural examinations were performed in transmission electron microscopy. The microscopic assessment was focused on the intensity of fibrosis in bladder submucosa and the presence of degenerative changes in the urothelium. Results Patients’ age, sex distribution, tumour diameters, surgeon experience or cancer stage did not differ between study groups. Immunohistochemical analysis did not reveal statistically significant differences between group 1 and group 2. From clinical point of view, ultrastructural analysis by electron microscopy showed higher rate of severe fibrosis in group 1 (63.6% vs. 38.5%), with no differences in the rate and degree of urothelial changes. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.32). Conclusions Bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumour is not a result of deficient structure of the bladder wall and surgical technique seems to play the most important role in its prevention.

Background Transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TUR) is associated with a risk of bladder perforation. The underlying mechanisms and risk factors are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine if bladder wall structure affects the risk of bladder perforation during TUR. Methods Fifteen patients who underwent TUR complicated by a bladder perforation (group 1) and fifteen matched controls who underwent uncomplicated TUR (group 2) were retrospectively enrolled into this morphological analysis. Surgical specimens were collected from all participating patients to describe the quality and architecture of urothelium and bladder submucosa. Immunohistochemical studies were performed with primary mouse anti-human E-cadherin, beta-catenin, type IV collagen, cytokeratin 20 and epithelial membrane antigen antibodies. The intensity of the immunohistochemical reaction was assessed using an immunoreactive score (IRS). Ultrastructural examinations were performed by transmission electron microscopy. The microscopic assessment was focused on the intensity of fibrosis in bladder submucosa and the presence of degenerative changes in the urothelium. Results Patients’ age, sex distribution, tumour diameters, surgeon experience or cancer stage did not differ between study groups. Immunohistochemical analysis did not reveal statistically significant differences between group 1 and group 2. From clinical point of view, ultrastructural analysis by electron microscopy showed higher rate of severe fibrosis in group 1 (63.6% vs. 38.5%), with no differences in the rate and degree of urothelial changes. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p=0.32). Conclusions Bladder perforation during TUR is not a result of deficient structure of the bladder wall. Based on available evidence, surgical technique seems to play the most important role in its prevention.