Background Penile Mondor disease is a superficial dorsal vein thrombophlebitis of the penis, which mainly affects young and middle-aged men. It generally manifests as a visible painful cord located along the dorsal surface of the penis with signs of skin inflammation. The condition is usually self-limiting, but in severe cases a surgical procedure may be necessary in addition to pharmacological treatment. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 is associated with a frequent incidence of thrombophilia; therefore, such a prothrombotic state during infection may be a significant risk factor for penile Mondor disease. Case presentation The 34-year-old patient reported moderate pain felt on the surface of the penis. During the medical interview, the patient did not admit significant risk factors for Mondor Disease, apart from the previous, a month earlier COVID-19 disease. Examination revealed swelling erythema and a thick indurated cord on the surface of the penis. Color Doppler ultrasound was performed to confirm assumptions and exclude thrombosis of other penile vessels. Based on visible clots in the course of the superficial penile vein and after exclusion of vasculitis due to autoimmune disease the diagnosis of penile Mondor disease was made. Pharmacological therapy was implemented to further break down the clot and prevent rethrombosis in the penile vessels. The patient did not report any treatment complications and returned for a control visit, which revealed complete clot dissolution on ultrasound; therefore, complete recovery was stated. Conclusions This case report presents the correlation between SARS-Cov-2 infection and penile Mondor disease, based on the confirmed influence of COVID-19 on the pathophysiology of thrombosis. It can be concluded that COVID- 19 is a risk factor for Mondor disease, as in the presented case the virus was the only prothrombotic risk factor for the patient. Consequently, the possibility of developing thrombosis in the form of penile Mondor disease should be taken into account among patients with post-COVID-19 and active SARS-Cov-2 infection.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) carries a significant risk of esophageal injury. Current methods of esophageal protection are invasive, expensive and their cost-effectiveness can be questioned. Standard placement of dispersive patch (DP) at patient’s back exposes esophagus to radio-frequency (RF) current-mediated thermal injury and such complications as esophageal wall ulceration, peri-esophageal injury or life-threatening atrio-esophageal fistula. Redirecting RF current by DP repositioning to anterior chest can theoretically protect oesophagus from thermal injury, however, such an approach has not yet been investigated. Aim To determine feasibility of anterior DP position for treatment of AF using RF catheter ablation (RFCA)-based system. Methods We retrospectively analysed consecutive patients undergoing  RFCA-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using multi-electrode PVAC catheter with DP located either in anterior or traditional-posterior position. Two additional patients underwent point-by-point RFCA and mapping of PV ostia with impedance measurements during RFCA performed using anterior and posterior DP positioning. Results 62 patients (25 females, age 60 ± 12 years) underwent PVI using PVAC: 40 patients in posterior and 22 in anterior DP group. There were no major complications during procedures. There was no significant difference in AF recurrence rate between anterior and posterior DP groups during one-year follow up (log rank p = 0.065). In two additional consecutive patients (1 female, age 74 ± 2 years) undergoing point-by-point RFCA a total number of 30 measurements around PV ostia were performed. There was a significant difference between impedance values in anterior vs posterior DP positions (134 ± 7 Ω vs 122 ± 8 Ω, p = 0.0004). Conclusions Anterior position of dispersive electrode for PV isolation using RFCA-based systems is safe, feasible, atraumatic and is not associated with any additional cost. Apart from redirecting RF current away from the esophagus, anterior dispersive patch placement is associated with higher impedance values which can act as an additional protection. Possible prevention of esophageal complications using anterior dispersive patch positioning needs to be determined in prospective studies. Abstract Figure. AF-free survival and impedance