Background: This work aimed to evaluate the influence of two chelators: DOTA(SCN) and DOTA(NHS) on radioimmunotherapy using 177 Lu-DOTA-Rituximab preparations in murine lymphoma xenograft models. Subsequently, based on animal data, the organ radiation-absorbed doses were extrapolated to humans (adult male). Materials and Methods: Therapeutic efficacy of 177 Lu-DOTA-Rituximab was evaluated in male nude mice bearing either Raji (B lymphocyte, CD20 +) and Jurkat (T lymphocyte, CD20) xenografts, utilizing an anti-CD20 antibody-Rituximab conjugate with either DOTA(SCN) or DOTA(NHS). The DOTA-Rituximab conjugates were prepared in the form of freeze-dried kits. Results: All radioimmunoconjugates were obtained with high radiolabeling yield (radiochemical purity, RCP > 95%) and specific activity of ca. 0.5 GBq/mg. Therapeutic effects of 177 Lu-DOTA-Rituximab were observed in animals regardless whether DOTA(SCN) or DOTA(NHS) were used for conjugation. Importantly, therapy involving 177 Lu-DOTA-Rituximab was more effective than use of Rituximab alone. Conclusions: The degree of antitumor efficacy was dependent on the type of applied bifunctional chelators conjugated to mAb. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Dosimetry calculations showed that the absorbed radiation doses extrapolated to humans were very low for osteogenic cells regardless of the conjugates. Organs like the liver and spleen, treated with 177 Lu-DOTA(SCN)-Rituximab, showed similar radiation absorbed doses when compared with 177 Lu-DOTA(NHS)-Rituximab.

Broad availability and cost-effectiveness of 99Mo/99mTc generators worldwide support the use, and thus the development, of novel 99mTc-labelled radiopharmaceuticals. In recent years, preclinical and clinical developments for neuroendocrine neoplasms patient management focused on somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SST2) antagonists, mainly due to their superiority in SST2-tumour targeting and improved diagnostic sensitivity over agonists. The goal of this work was to provide a reliable method for facile preparation of a 99mTc-labelled SST2 antagonist, [99mTc]Tc-TECANT-1, in a hospital radiopharmacy setting, suitable for a multi-centre clinical trial. To ensure successful and reproducible on-site preparation of the radiopharmaceutical for human use shortly before administration, a freeze-dried three-vial kit was developed. The final composition of the kit was established based on the radiolabelling results obtained during the optimisation process, in which variables such as precursor content, pH and buffer, as well as kit formulations, were tested. Finally, the prepared GMP-grade batches met all predefined specification parameters together with long-term kit stability and stability of the product [99mTc]Tc-TECANT-1. Furthermore, the selected precursor content complies with micro-dosing, based on an extended single-dose toxicity study, where histopathology NOEL was established at 0.5 mg/kg BW, being more than 1000 times higher than the planned human dose of 20 µg. In conclusion, [99mTc]Tc-TECANT-1 is suitable to be advanced into a first-in-human clinical trial.

No abstract

There has been considerable interest in developing a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against-CD-20 (for example, Rituximab) modified by bifunctional chelating agents (BCA) for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma radioimmunotherapy. Therefore, many researchers have modified this monoclonal antibody by attaching different BCA moieties and evaluated their biological activities in terms of in vitro study and in vivo study in healthy and tumor xenografted rodents. This mini-perspective reviews the in vitro studies, the immunoreactivity and physiological distribution studies: organ-to-blood and the tumor-to-organ ratio of conjugates with different numbers of chelators per mAb. We set up a null hypothesis that states there is no statistical significance between the biological activity of monoclonal antibody (Rituximab) and the number of conjugated bifunctional chelators. Overall, we have concluded that there is no strong evidence for this hypothesis. However, the literature data should be questioned due to the potential lack of uniform study methodology.