The seeds of pea and soybean were germinated with and without light at 20C up to 3 days. After germination, fresh sprouts were subjected to sensory evaluation using quantitative descriptive analysis and hedonic tests. Changes in the immunoreactivity of the samples were determined by competitive enzyme‐linked immunoabsorbent assay using rabbit polyclonal antisera to pea and soybean proteins. The results indicated that the sensory quality of pea sprouts was significantly better than that of soybean. The dominating attributes differentiating the soybean samples from the pea samples were rancid odor and taste, which had clearly negative effect on their overall quality. The immunoreactive properties of the samples were dependent on whether they were with or without cotyledons. Removal of the cotyledons almost completely reduced the immunoreactivity of soybean and pea. The presence or absence of light during the germination process did not affect the results.
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
The results indicated that the germination of pea and soybean seeds is a relevant processing technique for reducing their immunoreactivity. This suggests that pea and soybean sprouts could be used to develop the special products for people who suffer from food allergic disorders. Further studies in this field should be carried out to determine whether it is possible to reduce the total immunoreactivity of pea and soybean seeds by prolonging their germination time. From the sensory viewpoint, pea sprouts appear to have an advantage over soybean sprouts in food system applications. The substantial reasons for the limited use of soybean sprouts arise from their rancid odor and taste.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.