The purpose of this study was to estimate the burden of osteoporotic fractures beyond the hospitalization period covering up to the first year after the fracture. This was a prospective, 12-month, observational study including patients aged ≥65 years hospitalized due to a first low-trauma hip fracture, in six Spanish regions. Health resource utilization (HRU), quality of life (QoL) and autonomy were collected and total costs calculated. Four hundred and eighty seven patients (mean ± SD age 83 ± 7 years, 77 % women) were included. Twenty-two percent of patients reported a prior non-hip low-trauma fracture, 16 % were receiving osteoporotic treatment at baseline, and 3 % had densitometry performed (1.8 % T-score ≤−2.5). Sixteen percent of patients died (women 14 %; men 25 %; p = 0.0011) during the first year. Mean hospital stay was 11.8 ± 7.9 days and 95.1 % of patients underwent surgery. Other relevant HRUs were: outpatient visits in 78 % of patients (mean 9.2 ± 9.7); walking aids, 58.7 %; rehabilitation facilities, 35.5 % (28.7 ± 41.2 sessions); and formal and informal home care, 22.2 % (49.6 ± 72.2 days) and 53.4 % (77.1 ± 101.0 h), respectively. Mean direct cost was €9690 (95 % confidence interval: 9184–10,197) in women and €9019 (8079–9958) in men. Main cost drivers were: first hospitalization episode (women €7067 [73 %]; men €7196 [80 %]); outpatient visits (€1323 [14 %]; €997 [11 %]); and home care (€905 [9 %]; €767 [9 %]). QoL and autonomy showed a marked decrease during hospitalization, not entirely recovered at 12 months (p < 0.05 vs. baseline for EQ-5D, Harris hip score and modified Barthel index). In a Spanish setting, osteoporotic hip fractures incur a high societal and economic cost, mainly due to the first hospitalization HRU, but also due to subsequent outpatient visits and home care.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00223-016-0193-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Fascia iliaca block is a reproducible, safe and effective technique for pain management. It is a keystone in pain treatment for patients with a proximal femur fracture at our institution. Other objectives in our pain management protocol include early analgesia administration and reduction of time to surgery.
Background: Multimodal analgesia regimes including local infiltration analgesia (LIA) have been successfully applied in fast-track hip arthroplasty programmes. LIA’s contribution to the analgesic effect in hip arthroplasty has been questioned. Our study sought to determine the analgesic efficacy of LIA in THA surgery in a fast-track programme. Methods: Patients diagnosed with hip osteoarthritis scheduled for arthroplasty were randomised to receive LIA (120 ml ropivacaine 0.2% plus epinephrine 0.5 µ/ml) or saline as a part of a multimodal analgesia regime. The surgical team, the nursing staff, and patients were all blinded regarding patient allocation throughout the study. The primary outcome was pain assessed as a continuous variable using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 4, 8, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the amount of analgesic rescue consumption, complications and length of hospital stay. Results: A total of 63 patients were interviewed and agreed to participate in the study. No statistically significant differences were found between groups for pain measurements at 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 hours after surgery. There were also no differences in rescue medication consumption, complications, or length of stay. Conclusions: Our results suggest LIA (ropivacaine plus epinephrine, single shot) has no effect in pain management and has not shown benefits for early ambulation in primary THA surgery. Further research is needed to establish the optimal multimodal analgesia regime for THA fast-track programmes. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03513276).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.