Purpose To compare the efficacy of two storage media, Optisol GS and Dexsol, in preservation of donor corneal epithelium. Methods A total of 12 pairs of corneas not suitable for transplantation, all with intact epithelium, were used in this study, with one cornea of the pair stored in Optisol GS and its other counterpart in Dexsol. At each of three durations of storage -1, 2, and 4 days F four of these paired corneas were prepared for light microscopy and scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Another four pairs of control cornea were prepared in the same way and placed in universal fixative. Main outcome measures Evaluation of the corneas was made by two observers masked as to the identity of the storage medium and length of storage. Loss of epithelial cells was evaluated by light microscopy. The attachment of the epithelium to the basement membrane, cellular integrity, intercellular junctions, and intracellular organelles were evaluated and compared by electron microscopy. Results The magnitude of epithelial loss correlated with the length of storage time. Control corneas maintained normal epithelium with preservation of all epithelial cell layers. Corneas stored for 1 day had minimal damage of the epithelium. Corneas stored for 2 days had a slight increase in epithelial damage, and corneas stored for up to 4 days showed a marked increase in epithelial damage. There were no significant differences between the two storage media. The basal cell layer was maintained in both the media at all time points, usually in good condition with mild-to-moderate damage in some cases. Conclusions Loss of donor epithelium is related mainly to the length of storage and is similar in both Optisol GS and Dexsol. The storage time should be less than 4 days, especially when performing penetrating keratoplasty on patients with ocular surface disorders.
Purpose: To describe the clinical characteristics and treatment of spontaneous Descemet membrane (DM) detachment occurring decades after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Methods: A multicenter interventional case series design was used. We reviewed the medical records of 4 patients with a history of PK presenting with spontaneous DM detachment at 3 university hospitals in Israel and an ocular surgery institute in The Netherlands in 2016 to 2019. Patient demographic and clinical data, postoperative best corrected visual acuity, findings on preoperative and postoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and graft survival were recorded. Results: Patients were aged 46 to 50 years. All had undergone PK for keratoconus 20 to 26 years previously. Patients presented within 18 to 180 days of onset of visual disturbance. Symptoms included sudden painless visual loss (2 patients), gradual visual loss and foreign body sensation (1 patients), and visual loss not otherwise specified (1 patient). Slit-lamp examination showed corneal edema, and AS-OCT showed DM detachment of variable extent. In 2 patients, the initial diagnosis was graft rejection and failure. Treatment consisted of anterior chamber injection of air (n = 3) or 20% SF6 (n = 1). In 3 patients, the DM reattached and the cornea regained its clarity. The fourth patient had persistent DM detachment that required repeated PK. Conclusions: Spontaneous DM detachment can mimic late graft failure in patients after PK. If diagnosed early, DM reattachment may be performed by air/gas injection, avoiding repeated keratoplasty. Eyes with presumed late penetrating graft rejection or failure should be examined by AS-OCT to exclude DM detachment.
Bilateral keratomalacia, although a rare ophthalmic manifestation of PKU, can cause a severe corneal injury that may threaten the eyeball integrity. Surgical treatments with amniotic membrane graft and corneal transplantation, along with the appropriate diet treatment, were found to be effective procedures, yielding rapid healing of the corneal surface.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.