Objective Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) represents a bridge between the fields of psychiatry and cosmetic surgery. It is a psychiatric disorder involving altered body image and has been associated with cosmetic surgery. Many studies have investigated BDD following rhinoplasty. However, their findings were inconsistent, which prompted us to conduct this systematic review to obtain strong evidence about the prevalence of BDD among rhinoplasty candidates. Methods We searched the literature using electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and others using keywords relevant to the study outcomes. We also manually examined the references of the included studies and relevant reviews to look for articles that might have been missed during the electronic search. Results Nine articles met the inclusion criteria. We identified 7 other relevant articles; since they had been included in a review conducted in 2016, they were not included in the final list of articles. However, they were included in the discussion, and their findings have been compared with ours. The included articles resulted in a total sample of 712 rhinoplasty candidates. The estimated prevalence rates of BDD in these articles ranged from 22% to 52%, which was considered high by all the authors of the included studies. Conclusion The prevalence of BDD among rhinoplasty candidates is high, and adequate management and interventions are needed to reduce it.

: Prominent ears are considered the most common congenital external ear deformity among Caucasians. Affecting approximately 5% of the population, it runs in families and exhibits equal sex incidence. This study aimed to determine the complication rate from otoplasty in a tertiary facial plastic surgery center. This retrospective cross-sectional study included all patients with prominent ears deformities who underwent otoplasty at King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital between January 2019 and June 2021. The records of 116 patients who underwent otoplasty during the study period were examined and only 44 matched the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The total of 85 operated ears from 44 patients were included. Of these, 17 were pediatric patients and 25 were male patients. Forty-one patients underwent bilateral otoplasty and 3 underwent unilateral otoplasty. Complications occurred in 17/85 (20%) patients and the complications included recurrence 4 (4.70%), hypertrophic scar 3 (3.52%), keloid 2 (2.35), granuloma 2 (2.35%), infection 2 (2.35%), discomfort 1 (1.17%), wound dehiscence 1 (1.17%), hematoma 1 (1.17%), and retracted ear 1 (1.17%). The overall patient satisfaction was 38/44 (86.36%). Our study is first study conducted in middle east about otoplasty complications. It showed that the complications from otoplasty surgery varied from severe to mild, with acceptable overall satisfactory results. The most common complication was recurrence. Fortunately, serious complications, such as wound dehiscence and hematoma, were rare. However, our study’s small sample size remains a major limitation.

Objectives: We describe our novel modified spreader flap, which involves keeping the large cartilaginous septal T hump attached to the upper lateral cartilages to increase the thickness and length of the flap. Our objectives were to assess hump reduction and recurrence, nasal axis deviation, dorsal width, internal nasal valve grade, and Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) score preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Materials and Methods: In a prospective study that included 21 patients who met the criteria, patients were followed up for 1 year after surgery, with an assessment of the dorsal projection, tip projection, axis deviation, dorsal width, and internal nasal valve grade. In addition, the modified Cottle maneuver and Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation score were also performed and obtained, respectively. Results: Our novel technique was performed in 20 patients (95.2%). In 1 additional patient, we added a regular auto-spreader flap on the contralateral side. One year postoperatively, the axis was found in the midline in all patients (100%). Assessment of internal valve collapse showed that collapse was reduced to grade 0 in 13 patients (61.9%) and grade 1 in 8 patients (38.1%). There were no hump recurrences or visible irregularities. The results showed a statistically significant difference between the pre-and postoperative values in dorsal projection, dorsal width, and rhinoplasty outcome evaluation score. Conclusions: This novel technique shows promising statistically significant results in reducing dorsal hump projection and width, correcting axis deviation, and improving internal nasal valve and rhinoplasty outcome evaluation score, while being less cartilage and time-consuming.

The nasofrontal angle (radix) has a great impact on the rhinoplasty outcome. Minimal alterations in this area can give an unusual nasal appearance and midfacial length. Different management approaches have been described with regard to radix augmentation. This study aimed to describe the techniques of rhinoplasty, different materials used in the procedure, and results of at least 1 year of follow-up in our 12-year experience in this field. The authors retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who underwent rhino-plasty/septorhinoplasty with radix augmentation performed by 1 of the authors (a senior surgeon at our institution) using different graft materials, between January 2007 and December 2019. Patients younger than 18 years or who were followed up for less than 1 year were excluded from the study. In total, 387 patients (235 [60.7%] female; age range, 19–39 years) were included. Primary procedures were performed in 311 patients (80.5%), and revision procedures were performed in 76 patients (19.6%). Most patients (97%) were satisfied with the aesthetic result. There was no incidence of infection, displacement, or extrusion of the graft. The only complications observed were irregularities; 3% required revision surgery. It is important to consider the nasal radix when pursuing a balanced profile in rhinoplasty. Many graft materials can be used safely and can achieve good aesthetic outcomes. Proper anatomical analysis and patient selection are essential for successful graft placement.