Children who are in conflict with the law cannot be separated from the responsibilities of parents as the first party in the child's environment. The relationship between parents and children is a harmonized relationship from a strong emotional connection on the basis of blood relations. This situation makes parents unable to release and be released responsibility for their children's behavior. When children are faced with the law, policies to take over the responsibility of supervising children from parents, by denying that parents actually have the opportunity to deal with the problems of children who are dealing with the law are more often chosen. Even though the responsibility is transferred from the parents, they will find it difficult to rebuild the relationships they previously had with their children. This connection shows that parents also play a role when their children commit criminal acts indirectly

Criminal acts committed by children should be placed in LPKA as referred to in the law on juvenile justice, however the judge in this decision prefers to place the child in the development of a boarding school, of course in this case the judge has his own considerations. This paper will examine the basic legal considerations of judges in imposing criminal guidance on children who are criminal offenders of theft with weighting, the suitability of decision Number: 8/Pid.Sus-Anak/2016/PN.Kot with the demands of the Public Prosecutor, and the mechanism for implementing the verdict. Number: 8/Pid.Sus-Anak/2016/PN.Kot. The research method used in this research uses a normative approach, namely normative research which is carried out by examining the laws and basic theories. As for the results of the research, it was found that the basis for judges' legal considerations in making decisions against children, that in the trial the judge saw the two children who committed the crime not because of the crime factor but because the dominant factor of juvenile delinquency and also the two children could still be mentally corrected by giving opportunity for both children will certainly provide protection for their rights. The judge's decision was not in accordance with the prosecutor's demands where there were differences, namely: first, the judge did not agree with the method of imposing penalties that put children in LPKA; second, the judge's freedom to impose sanctions is also a factor in the incompatibility between the prosecutor's demands and the judge's decision; third, the impact of the harm caused by the two children was not too big. The mechanism for implementing the Decision Number:8/Pid.Sus-Anak/2016/Pn.Kot where the judge handed down the punishment of coaching in the institution to the two defendants in the form of an obligation to participate in a coaching program at the Islamic Boarding School, so that the guidance method followed the guidance method in the pesantren. Based on the results of the research conducted, it is recommended that the Public Prosecutor pay more attention to aspects of benefit in imposing criminal sanctions on children. In addition, the judge's future considerations should reflect justice and progressive steps.

erusakan hutan mengalami peningkatan luas kerusakan setiap tahun di Indonesia. Setidaknya, sekitar 857.756 hektare. Terdiri dari 630.451 hektar lahan mineral dan 227.304 hektar lahan gambut. Angka ini meningkat 160% dibandingkan sebelumnya yang luasnya sekitar 328.724 hektar. Situasi ini akan berdampak pada lingkungan secara keseluruhan, termasuk perubahan iklim pada kenaikan suhu udara. Pemerintah sudah banyak mengkampanyekan larangan kebakaran hutan dan illegal logging, namun kebakaran hutan dan illegal logging masih saja terjadi, sehingga perlu mengintensifkan instrumen lain. Yakni dengan memanfaatkan peran masyarakat adat, mereka memiliki banyak kebijakan lokal yang dapat dimunculkan dan dijadikan salah satu kebijakan nasional dalam rangka pencegahan terjadinya tindak pidana pembakaran hutan dan illegal logging. Metode penulisan makalah ini adalah penelitian non doktrinal, dengan wawancara mendalam kepada tokoh masyarakat adat, kemudian hasil wawancara mendalam dianalisis untuk dijadikan rekomendasi temuan penelitian. Hasilnya adalah model penegakan hukum di masyarakat adat, dalam praktiknya sejalan dengan konsep hukum pidana administrasi. Konsep hukum ini menekankan pada prinsip penegakan hukum yang tidak berorientasi pidana sebagai pilihan utama. Masyarakat adat mengutamakan upaya pencegahan berupa larangan perusakan hutan, kemudian pembatasan mengambil kayu hutan, dan kewajiban menanam kembali pohon.

The death penalty in Indonesia is still maintained to combat crime within the Indonesian criminal law reform. Although many states have it removed, Indonesia would have the sole discretion to keep it. Despite the opposition, the death penalty application still has a juridical and sociological basis, so it is still legal to be maintained. Indonesia itself has overshadowed the death penalty with a form of legality according to international law so that the position of Indonesia that still maintain the death penalty cannot be blamed. Moreover, sociologically, Indonesian people still accept those who commit an offence who may have profound implications that could lead to the death penalty. This issue is what became the basis for lawmakers in Indonesia to keep it. This research uses the doctrinal method toexamine various regulations regarding capital punishment and non-doctrinal to understand the community's situation related to the existence of capital punishment in Indonesia. The death penalty is a more effective deterrent and therefore prevents crime better. With the death penalty, others were about to commit a similar crime is expected not to commit the crime. The death penalty is more effectively immobilizing offenders. Perpetrators, in principle, still manage to have the desire to commit the crime again after release. The death penalty for perpetrators of crimes is not a violation of human rights, but rather to respect human rights itself, namely for victims of crime. The setting and the application of the death penalty in Indonesia until now is still needed. They are considering that there are still many crimes that undermine humanity's values or the crimes that harm the State and crackdown on corruption in society.

Indonesian law enforcement had a different characteristic. Usually, we know the lady symbol for justice and law enforcement. Actually, Indonesia have another symbol for justice, is a banyan tree. The different is, the lady symbol said justice is a right or wrong, and law make the punishment. The banyan tree symbol said, justice is to looking for how to bringing back the balances. Indonesia should be use the Pengayoman. It's mean, how to make the legal problem is finished with win-win solution, not who is right or who is wrong. This characteristic is growth from Indonesian genuine law (adat law/custom law). This model (pengayoman), can minimize conflict after law enforcement and pengayoman want to make the legal problem is fixed by them. Index Terms-Indonesian Law Enforcement, BanyanTree, Pengayoman.