Klippel-Feil syndrome is an uncommon anomaly that may be asymptomatic. Early clinical signs such as restricted neck motion or short neck can be subtle and incorrectly treated as spasms. High incidence of associated craniovertebral junction (CVJ) anomalies such as occipitalized atlas predisposes them to serious neurologic complications requiring invasive procedures and surgeries. However, these often have anomalous vertebral artery course which is more prone to injury during CVJ procedures, and also sparsely known in radiology literature. We demonstrate the importance of computed tomography angiography in preprocedural planning to avoid catastrophic injury to anomalous vertebral artery at CVJ in such case.

No abstract

Patients with craniovertebral junction anomalies are more likely to undergo craniovertebral junction procedures because of neurologic complications. Vertebral arteries (VAs) are more prone to injury in these cases because of an often anomalous course, with potentially disabling or grave sequel. In our patient with partially occipitalized atlas, CT angiogram revealed that 1 of the VAs passed through the bony canal in the occipitalized and/or fused bone, whereas the VA on unfused side was also unexpectedly anomalous and of C2 segmental type. To the best of our knowledge, such anomaly has never been reported in studies of patients with occipitalized atlas in the literature.

Purpose This study aimed to determine the ability of ultrasound to predict survival and detect more aggressive tumors in women with ovarian masses. Materials and methods Institutional review board approval was obtained. A total of 167 patients who presented with adnexal mass/masses were included. These were documented as benign or malignant on ultrasound. Age, date of diagnosis and date of death, type of tumor, and tumor marker cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) values were recorded. A CA-125 value of less than 35 U/mL was considered normal. All cases underwent surgery. Pathologic findings were considered as reference standard. The 2 × 2 cross-tabulations were used to correlate dichotomized CA-125, US diagnosis (benign vs malignant), and pathologic status. Difference of distributions was tested using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, and their association was tested using the Fisher exact test. All tests were 2-sided, and P values of 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant. Kaplan-Meir curves were generated to estimate survival. Results There was a statistically significant difference in patients with benign versus malignant tumors based on pathology (P < 0.0001) and ultrasound (P < 0.0003). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of ultrasound were 55%, 86%, 90% and 46%, and 81%. Patients diagnosed as having malignant tumors based on ultrasound had statistically significant worse overall survival. Probability of survival based on pathologic diagnosis of malignancy was statistically significant at P < 0.0003; based on ultrasound, P < 0.0001; and based on CA-125, P < 0.041. Conclusion Patients who had ultrasound-based prediction of ovarian malignancy had overall worse survival probability (P < 0.0001) compared with CA-125– or pathology-based prediction.

No abstract