Electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings are often contaminated with muscle artifacts. This disturbing myogenic activity not only strongly affects the visual analysis of EEG, but also most surely impairs the results of EEG signal processing tools such as source localization. This article focuses on the particular context of the contamination epileptic signals (interictal spikes) by muscle artifact, as EEG is a key diagnosis tool for this pathology. In this context, our aim was to compare the ability of two stochastic approaches of blind source separation, namely independent component analysis (ICA) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA), and of two deterministic approaches namely empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and wavelet transform (WT) to remove muscle artifacts from EEG signals. To quantitatively compare the performance of these four algorithms, epileptic spike-like EEG signals were simulated from two different source configurations and artificially contaminated with different levels of real EEG-recorded myogenic activity. The efficiency of CCA, ICA, EMD, and WT to correct the muscular artifact was evaluated both by calculating the normalized mean-squared error between denoised and original signals and by comparing the results of source localization obtained from artifact-free as well as noisy signals, before and after artifact correction. Tests on real data recorded in an epileptic patient are also presented. The results obtained in the context of simulations and real data show that EMD outperformed the three other algorithms for the denoising of data highly contaminated by muscular activity. For less noisy data, and when spikes arose from a single cortical source, the myogenic artifact was best corrected with CCA and ICA. Otherwise when spikes originated from two distinct sources, either EMD or ICA offered the most reliable denoising result for highly noisy data, while WT offered the better denoising result for less noisy data. These results suggest that the performance of muscle artifact correction methods strongly depend on the level of data contamination, and of the source configuration underlying EEG signals. Eventually, some insights into the numerical complexity of these four algorithms are given.
Abstract. Independent Component Analysis (ICA) plays an important role in biomedical engineering. Indeed, the complexity of processes involved in biomedicine and the lack of reference signals make this blind approach a powerful tool to extract sources of interest. However, in practice, only few ICA algorithms such as SOBI, (extended) InfoMax and FastICA are used nowadays to process biomedical signals. In this paper we raise the question whether other ICA methods could be better suited in terms of performance and computational complexity. We focus on ElectroEncephaloGraphy (EEG) data denoising, and more particularly on removal of muscle artifacts from interictal epileptiform activity. Assumptions required by ICA are discussed in such a context. Then fifteen ICA algorithms, namely JADE, CoM2, SOBI, SOBI rob , (extended) InfoMax, PICA, two different implementations of FastICA, ERICA, SIMBEC, FOBIUMJAD, TFBSS, ICAR3, FOOBI1 and 4-CANDHAPc are briefly described. Next they are studied in terms of performance and numerical complexity. Quantitative results are obtained on simulated epileptic data generated with a physiologically-plausible model. These results are also illustrated on real epileptic recordings.
14 pagesInternational audienceTwo main drawbacks can be stated in the alternating least square (ALS) algorithm used to fit the canonical decomposition (CAND) of multi-way arrays. First its slow convergence caused by the presence of collinearity between factors in the multi-way array it decomposes. Second its blindness to Hermitian symmetries of the considered arrays. Enhanced line search (ELS) scheme was found to be a good way to cope with the slow convergence of the ALS algorithm together with a partial use of the Hermitian symmetry. However, to our knowledge, required equations to perform the latter scheme are only given in the case of third and fifth order arrays. Therefore, our first contribution consists in generalizing the ELS procedure to the case of complex arrays of any order greater than three. Our second contribution is another improvement of the ALS scheme, able to profit from Hermitianity and positive semi-definiteness of the considered arrays. It consists in resorting to the CAND first of a third order array having one unitary loading matrix and second of several rank-1 arrays. An iterative algorithm is then proposed alternating between Procrustes problem solving and the computation of rank-one matrix approximations in order to achieve the CAND of the third order array
This paper tackles the slowness issue of the well-known Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm in the context of Gaussian Mixture Models. To cope with this slowness problem, an Exact Line Search scheme is proposed. It is based on exact computation of the step size required to jump, for a given search direction, towards the final solution. Computing this exact step size is easily done by only rooting a second-order polynomial computed from the initial log-likelihood maximization problem. Numerical results using both simulated and real dataset showed the efficiency of the proposed exact line search scheme when applied to the conventional EM algorithm as well as the Anti-Annealing based acceleration techniques based on either the EM or the Expectation Conjugate Gradient algorithm.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.