Background:Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a chronic and common disease, which is characterized by heartburn and regurgitation. In the last couple of decades, GERD has received much attention and studies have shown an increase in its prevalence. Although there have been a few studies on the prevalence of GERD in Iran, no study has yet been done in the northeastern part of the country. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of GERD and its risk factors in a population from Mashhad.Objectives:To evaluate the epidemiology of GERD based on a population study in Mashhad.Patients and Methods:This was a cross sectional descriptive study conducted in 2010. In total, 2500 participants were selected based on cluster sampling. Modified and validated Mayo Clinic questionnaire for GERD was used for data collection. Overall, 1685 questionnaires were retrieved. Fifty-one participants were excluded because of pregnancies, history of abdominal surgery and being less than 18 years old. We analyzed data using the SPSS software version 16. Prevalence of GERD and significant risk factors (P value < 0.05) were determined.Results:In total, 420 participants (25.7%) had GERD symptoms. Risk factors with significant effects consisted of smoking, consumption of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NASIDs), overeating, chronic diseases, tea and coffee consumption and GERD in spouse.Conclusions:The prevalence of GERD among people living in Mashhad was above the average prevalence in other cities of Iran. However, risk factors seemed to be similar to those reported by other studies.

Background:The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has been introduced as an efficient method for the assessment of medical students.Objectives:The aim of the present study was to determine the satisfaction level of undergraduate medical students of internal medicine department with the OSCE.Materials and Methods:This was a descriptive cross-sectional study, performed on all available undergraduate students at the end of their internal medicine training period in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. The students responded to 15 multiple-choice questions with confirmed validity and reliability.Results:The majority of the students (94.5%) had a positive attitude toward the OSCE and mentioned that the OSCE format was a more appropriate type of exam than other methods of testing; however, 79.1% thought that the OSCE format was stressful. In addition, the participants’ sex had no effect on their level of satisfaction with the examination. Likewise, there was no significant correlation between their level of satisfaction and their age, marital status, or lack of previous experience with this type of exam.Conclusions:If the exam standards are met and a uniform dispersion of the scientific content is maintained, the OSCE method of assessment can be recommended as an efficient and applicable method for assessing medical students.

The DNA repair gene O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is frequently methylated in colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to demonstrate that MGMT methylation may be one of the candidate mediators of field cancerization in the colon mucosa. Therefore, quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was performed on tumor itself and additional samples of 5 and 10 cm away from the tumor in 40 CRC patients. Moreover, colon mucosa was examined from 30 cases with no evidence of cancer as a control. MGMT promoter methylation was present in 27.5% of colorectal tumor specimens. Tumors that showed MGMT promoter methylation had substantial MGMT promoter methylation in their normal adjacent mucosa. The methylation was also observed in 36.36% (4/11) of normal samples with MGMT promoter methylation in the adjacent tumors, in 20.79% (6/29) of samples without MGMT methylation in the adjacent tumors, and in 6.66% (2/30) of control samples (p<0.006 and p<0.001 respectively). Finally, the mean of MGMT methylation levels was significantly higher in the cancerous group than in the control group (6.25±1.702 vs. 0.086±0.036, p<0.001). Some CRCs arise from a field defect defined by epigenetic inactivation of MGMT. Detection of such abnormality may ultimately be useful in risk assessment for CRCs.