A clastic gas reservoir with unconsolidated sandstone layers present great challenges for an effective development, because the tendency of these layers to produce sand. The objective of this paper is to present and highlight the applications of geomechanics in predicting critical drawdown pressure during the completion design and flowback test design with the ultimate purpose of minimizing the sand production. This paper will evaluate the perforation strategy for wells that may be prone to produce sand as part of the completion design optimization. A geomechanical approach was implemented to evaluate the interaction between stress field and the mechanical properties of rocks. A 1-D Mechanical Earth Model (MEM) was built and calibrated with offset wells in the nearby area. The overburden pressure was calculated by integrating density logs from the offset wells. The minimum horizontal stress was calibrated using closure pressure derived from the offset fracture analysis carried out in the offset wells. The rock elastic properties were calibrated with lab test data from an offset well locate ~2 km away from Well_A. Two case studies will be presented in this paper. The first case is Well_A drilled in a Devonian clastic reservoir, this vertical gas well was perforated with 60 degrees phasing guns. The well had a good performance during the flow back but the production was short-lived due to significant sand production. The second case is a blind test to validate the robustness of the methodology used in the first case study. An integrated approach was used to determine the most optimum way to perforate similar wells that has a potential to produce sand. Modified Lade failure criterion was used to predict the critical drawdown pressure because it takes into account the intermediate stress along with other geomechanical properties.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.