No abstract

Ductal adenocarcinoma is a rare subtype of prostate cancer with a worse prognosis.Histologically, it is characterized by the presence of tall, pseudostratified columnar epithelium with abundant cytoplasm organized in a papillary or cribriform-papillary pattern. Several clinical differences distinguish this subtype of prostate cancer by the conventional acinar adenocarcinoma: exophytic growth into the prostatic urethra, different clinical presentation, different sites of metastasis and more aggressiveness. The rarity of this tumour forced to base our knowledge on small case series or on individual case reports, and does not help to establish appropriate guidelines. Therefore, the diagnosis of this tumour masks clinical implications that are still not well-understood.We report the case of a 69-year-old Caucasian man with a diagnosis of pure prostate ductal adenocarcinoma that early developed multiple metastases after radical prostatectomy. The patient started hormonal therapy with a fast biochemical and radiologic (positron emission tomography-computed tomography, PET-CT) hormonal escape. Therefore, we took the decision to perform chemotherapy with Taxotere along with prednisolone with a relative stability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, but a new PET-CT scan showed a further progression of the disease. Finally, the patient underwent therapy with Abiraterone acetate that did not stop the cancer progression.No therapeutic options available showed a good control of disease progression. PSA proved to be a poor marker while, on the contrary, PET-CT scan has proved to be particularly useful in the management of the disease progression. More efforts are required to add new knowledge about this tumour and assess what is known until now.

Background: Perioperative bleeding is a potential complication of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) that may worsen outcomes. The role of local hemostatic materials in RALP has not been adequately assessed. We evaluated the hemostatic impact of FloSeal (Baxter International Inc., Fremont, Calif., USA) in RALP. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of 392 consecutive patients with prostate cancer who underwent RALP at our institution between February 2008 and July 2014. The patients were divided into 2 consecutive homogenous groups based on the use of FloSeal. Group A included 200 patients who underwent RALP between February 2008 and May 2011, with hemostasis performed using only traditional techniques. Group B included the remaining 192 patients, who underwent RALP between June 2011 and July 2014 and received FloSeal 5 ml after traditional hemostatic methods. We compared the blood transfusion rate, the differences between immediate postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) and mean postoperative day 1 (POD1) Hb levels, difference between POD1 and least Hb levels and difference between immediate postoperative Hb and least Hb levels. Results: The intraoperative use of FloSeal significantly decreased the blood transfusions rate, from 8.5 to 2.1% (p = 0.004). FloSeal was also associated with significant improvements in the difference between the immediate postoperative Hb and POD1 Hb levels (p = 0.03), mean POD1 Hb and least Hb (p = 0.01) and mean immediate postoperative Hb and least Hb levels (p = 0.034). Conclusions: In this study, the use of FloSeal improves hemostatic outcomes in patients undergoing RALP compared with traditional hemostatic techniques, without increase of cost.

No abstract

No abstract