Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is commonly treated with immunomodulators such as azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP). Studies examining lymphoma risk in IBD patients treated with these medications have been underpowered and have yielded conflicting conclusions. Aims: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to provide a more precise estimate of the relative risk of lymphoma among IBD patients treated with azathioprine or 6-MP. Methods: Studies were included if they were English language, full article, cohort studies specifically designed to evaluate cancer as an adverse outcome of treatment with azathioprine or 6-MP. Pooled standardised incidence ratios were calculated to estimate the relative risk of lymphoma associated with therapy. Heterogeneity was assessed using Poisson regression. Sensitivity analyses examined the influence of individual studies on risk estimate and heterogeneity statistics. Results: Six studies were identified that met our inclusion criteria. When the data were combined across all studies, the pooled relative risk was 4.18 (95% confidence interval 2.07-7.51; 11 observed cases, 2.63 expected). Sensitivity analysis showed that exclusion of any one study had a relatively small effect on the pooled relative risk estimate (range 3.49-5.21) but excluding either the study with the highest or lowest estimated relative risk eliminated the statistically significant heterogeneity. Conclusions: Our data suggest an approximate fourfold increased risk of lymphoma in IBD patients treated with azathioprine/6-MP. The increased risk of lymphoma could be a result of the medications, the severity of the underlying disease, or a combination of the two.
When patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are admitted to the hospital with a flare of acute severe colitis, the possibility of a concurrent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causing or worsening the colitis is often considered. IBD patients are usually immunosuppressed, and therefore presumably at increased risk for active CMV infection and disease. Multiple techniques are used to diagnose CMV infection, including endoscopy, histology, serology, viral culture, CMV antigen testing, and CMV DNA testing. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) performed on colon biopsy specimens with monoclonal antibodies directed against CMV immediate early antigen is considered by most to be the current gold standard for diagnosis. The prevalence of CMV infection in acute severe colitis appears to be 21-34%, and the prevalence of CMV infection in the steroid refractory subgroup of these patients is 33-36%. After antiviral therapy, colitis remission rates in IBD patients with CMV infection range from 67% to 100%, though CMV histological infection or the presence of circulating virus alone is not always associated with steroid resistance, and may not require antiviral therapy.
Chronic inflammatory diseases, depending upon the duration and severity, are frequently associated with an increased risk of developing cancer. A classic paradigm is the enhanced risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Carcinogenesis is a multifactorial process that involves accumulation of genetic defects, protein modification, and cell-matrix interaction. In this review, we discuss aspects of chronic inflammation in IBD that influence the development of CRC and highlight the key molecular mediators involved in this process. Also, we identify potential targets that could facilitate earlier detection of dysplasia. The targeted manipulation of specific molecules or pathways could provide opportunities for the development of therapeutic and chemopreventive interventions, which may prove effective in arresting the progression of colitis-associated cancer (CAC), with clinical implications.
The medicinal leech possesses FMRFamide-like immunoreactivity in neural processes and somata associated with the pharynx and pharyngeal ganglia. The pharynx possessed about 25 immunoreactive somata; about half of the approximately 20 neurons of the pharyngeal ganglia were immunoreactive. We provide brief descriptions of several neurons located in the first neuromere of the subesophageal ganglion involved in controlling pharyngeal motility. Double-labeling experiments indicate that one of these cells, named Swallow neuron 1 (SW1), contains a FMRFamide-like peptide. Stimulation of SW1 caused the mouth to open and the pharynx to dilate. Upon termination of SW1 stimulation, the mouth closed, and a peristaltic wave progressed from the mouth down the length of the pharynx. Stimulation of SW1 did not produce 1:1 postsynaptic potentials in pharyngeal muscle cells. Thus, SW1 is apparently not a motor neuron. The pharynx responded to application of FMRFamide and related peptides by producing a series of 20- to 35-s phasic contractions superimposed upon an increase in basal tonus. The peptide-induced response was quantified by measuring increases in basal tonus, peak tension, and integrated area. Although there were some differences in the order of potency depending upon which parameter was considered, the approximate order of potency of RFamide peptides tested was: pQDPFLRFamide > or = FMRFamide approximately YGGFMRFamide > or = YMRFamide approximately FLRFamide approximately GGKYMRFamide approximately YLRFamide > leucomyosuppressin approximately perisulfakinin. Except for differences in potency, each of the RFamide peptides produced similar contractile waveforms. FMRFamide-induced responses were reduced by the protein kinase C inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide I (10 microM), the nonspecific protein kinase inhibitor H-7 (50 microM), and were increased by the protein phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid (1 microM). However, the FMRFamide-induced response was unaffected by the protein kinase A inhibitor H-89 (1 microM), the phosphodiesterase inhibitor theophylline (1 mM), the phospholipase A(2) inhibitor OBAA (0.1 microM) or the cation channel blocker amiloride (100 microM).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.