Refinery plants use diethanolamine (DEA) solutions for gas sweetening. The role of DEA is to absorb H 2 S from sour gas. Amine Regeneration Units (ARU) are used to regenerate the rich Amine with H 2 S from refinery units to Lean Amine. An ARU unit of a Middle Eastern refinery that began official production in 2020 was simulated using Aspen HYSYS V.11, and an exergy study was conducted on different equipment. Whereas energy is transformed from one form to another, the exergy is destroyed in an irreversible process. The total exergy was equal to the physical and chemical exergy. The physical exergy was calculated using HYSYS, and the chemical exergy was calculated using a series of equations embedded in Excel. The DEA concentration used was 25 wt%. The exergy destruction rates, destruction efficiency, and percentage share of destruction of each piece of equipment were calculated. The regenerator exhibited the highest destruction rate of 13459.73 kW, and a percentage share of 79.61% of the total destruction. The overall exergy efficiency was 99.7%. The DEA concentration decreased from 25% to 20% as a result of system losses during start-up. Therefore, a case study was conducted to test the effect of this decrease in the H 2 S concentration in the sweet gas, and no effect was observed. An exergy study was conducted using an DEA of 20%. The distribution of the equipment destruction did not change. The total destruction loss increased by 2057.08 kW. From the exergy and operation point of view, the best scenario was to use a 25% concentration, to prevent destruction losses and operation problems.
Sulfur recovery units (SRU) have an important role in the industrial production of elemental sulfur from hydrogen sulfide, whereas the generated acidic gas emissions must be controlled and treated based on local and international environmental regulations. Herein, Aspen HYSYS V.11 with Sulsim software is used to simulate the industrial and treatment processes in a refinery plant in the Middle East. In the simulation models, in temperature, pressure, flow, energy, and gas emissions were monitored to predict any expected change that could occur during the industrial processes. The simulation models were validated by comparing the obtained data with actual industrial data, and the results showed low deviation values. The simulation results showed that the current process temperature conditions can work efficiently for sulfur production without causing any environmental consequences. Interestingly, the simulation results revealed that sulfur can be produced under the optimized temperature conditions (20° less than design temperatures) with a total amount of steam reduction by 1040.12 kg/h and without any negative impact on the environment. The steam reduction could have a great economic return, where an average cost of 7.6 $ per ton could be saved with a total estimated cost savings by 69,247.03 $ per year. The simulation revealed an inaccurate production capacity calculated by real data in the plant during the performance test guarantee (PTG) where the real data achieved around 1 ton/h higher capacity than the simulation result, with an overall recovery efficiency of 99.96%. Based on this significant result, a solution was raised, and the level transmitters were calibrated, then the test was repeated. The simulation models could be very useful for engineers to investigate and optimize the reaction conditions during the industrial process in sulfur production facilities. Hence, the engineers can utilize these models to recognize any potential problem, thereby providing effective and fast solutions. Additionally, the simulation models could participate in assessing the performance test guarantee (PTG) calculations provided by the contractor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.