Background Clinical pharmacists have important roles in implementing scientifically valid knowledge and advice on safe, reasonable use of pharmaceuticals. Clinical pharmacy services were introduced and evaluated in oncology clinic in a tertiary university hospital. Methods A prospective interventional study was conducted from November 2017 to March 2018. Drug-related problems were classified using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe drug-related problem classification tool v8.01. The main outcome measure is the proposed interventions aimed at identification of the drug-related problems, the role of the pharmacists in the resolution, and the rate of acceptance of these recommendations by physicians. Results A total of 102 patients were included in the study, who were treated with at least two cycles of any cancer type and stage. A total of 55 (53.9%) patients had 251 drug-related problems. Drug-related problems mainly involved antihypertensive (31.6%), antidiabetic (17.8%), and herbal agents (31.6%). Treatment effectiveness was the major type of drug-related problems (50.2%) followed by treatment safety (29.1%). A total of 211 (100%) interventions were accepted and regarded as clinically relevant. Prescriber informed only were the most common types of intervention at the prescriber level. Eighty-six point four percent identified drug-related problems were solved, 9.8% of the problems were partially solved, 2.3% problems were unsolved. Conclusion Clinical pharmacy services may have optimized therapy effectiveness, prevent adverse effects and unclear/compliant problems. The pharmacist interventions were highly acknowledged by oncologists and patients; this may indicate the presence of a great convenience and need to implement Clinical pharmacy services in alternative hospitals in Northern Cyprus.

Background Multiple factors have been reported to affect adherence to medication, including beliefs about medicines, while specifically tailored pharmaceutical care services for patients may improve adherence. The aim was to assess the impact of counselling by an oncology pharmacist on patients' medication adherence and beliefs. Methods An interventional prospective study was performed in the oncology department at a tertiary hospital in Northern Cyprus from November 2017 to April 2018. The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire was used to evaluate the balance between beliefs about necessity and concerns and medication beliefs before and after an educational intervention. The Morisky Green Levine Test 2018 was used to evaluate adherence. Results In total, 81 patients (65.4% females; mean age: 59.1 ± 11.34 years; 34.6% hypertensive; 19.8% with diabetes) were analysed before and after receiving counselling from an oncology pharmacist. Pharmacist education significantly enhanced the mean patient necessity-concern balance scores by two-fold (MT0(baseline) = −3.1 ± 8.6; MT1(posteducation) =3.0 ± 7.3; p < 0.0001), with patients who received counselling for the first time experiencing the greatest benefit. Multivariate analysis showed that patients who had a negative balance between their beliefs about the necessity of the medication and their concerns were less likely to adhere to the medication (0.138 (0.025–0.772)). Conclusion Counselling by an oncology pharmacist was effective in decreasing patient concerns and increasing their understanding of the necessity of the medication, thus enhancing their adherence and consequently improving the care they received.

Spiralling costs in research and development (R&D), shorter product lifecycles, fragmented patient markets and an increasing requirement to demonstrate value through a wider range of outcomes, are all limiting the potential return from expensive treatments. Incumbents failing to evolve in line with these trends are in danger of being outmaneuvered by new entrants. In this paper, we assess how current business and operating models can be adapted to mitigate the effects of a changing oncology paradigm.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has been felt in all areas of health care. We performed a weekly survey amongst the members of the European Society of Oncology Pharmacy (ESOP) to better understand its effects and how they evolved over time. We specifically studied alterations in the care for patients with cancer as well as in the work of oncology pharmacists. Methods: An online survey was developed by ESOP to compile data about the effects of COVID-19 on the work practices of professionals working in the field of oncology pharmacy. The survey was distributed electronically on a weekly basis from April 6th to June 28th. Results: A total of 1146 responses were gathered from respondents in 60 different countries. At any given time point, between 25% and 38% of the respondents had staff infected with COVID-19. In total, 29% of hospital pharmacists reported shortages of drugs necessary for the treatment of COVID-19 patients, and almost 50% also faced shortages of drugs necessary for the treatment of cancer patients. In addition, the majority of hospital pharmacists reported a decrease in planned surgery for oncology patients, as well as a decrease in the amount of chemotherapy preparations. Community pharmacists faced shortages of personal protective equipment in 40% of cases and shortages of drugs in 60%. Conclusion: The work of oncology pharmacists both in the clinical setting as well as in the community has been effected profoundly by the COVID-19 pandemic.