Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is associated with pain during the four-step procedure. This prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted to investigate the effect of the analgesic flurbiprofen, administered prior to HSG, in 60 women. Thirty women were randomized to receive 100 mg of flurbiprofen, orally, 1 h prior to HSG and a further 30 women were randomized to receive placebo. Injection of contrast medium was more painful than the other steps in the HSG procedure in both groups; however, there was no significant between-group difference in terms of pain experienced in the individual steps of HSG. Pain scores at 5 and 30 min after the procedure were compared between the two groups. There was a significant decrease in the visual analogue scale pain score in the flurbiprofen-treated group compared with the placebo-treated group at both time points. Thus, the authors recommend flurbiprofen as a prophylactic analgesic to be administered before HSG procedures.

Prenatal diagnosis is testing for diseases or conditions in a fetus or embryo before it is born. It employs a variety of techniques to determine the health and condition of an unborn fetus. The main goal of this process is to perform prenatal diagnosis at the earliest possible stage of gestation. In this regard, quantitative fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR), a novel technique that is fast and reliable, was employed to detect aneuploidies (13, 18, 21, X and Y) without the need of the time-consuming culturing process. The QF-PCR method can detect five different chromosome aneuploidies with 98.6% accuracy. In this study, 1874 amniotic fluid samples of pregnant subjects, who were referred to the Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, Adana, Turkey (molecular biology section), were analyzed with the QF-PCR technique by employing 27 short tandem repeat (STR) markers to detect chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y aneuploidies. We detected 31 subjects (1.7%) with aneuploidies or euploidies out of the 1874 subjects. The average age of the pregnant subjects was 32 (range: 14–49). Abnormal karyotypes detected were as follows: 47,XX,+21 (19.4%, 6/31), 47,XY,+21 (48.4%, 15/31), 48,XXX,+21 (3.2%, 1/31), 69,XXX (3.2%, 1/31), 47,XY,+13 (3.2%, 1/31), 47,XXY (9.6%, 3/31), 47,XXX (9.6%, 3/31) and 45,X (3.2%, 1/31). Moreover, some STR markers were found to be more specific to the Turkish population. In conclusion, QF-PCR can be regarded as an alternative method of conventional cytogenetic analysis as it is a rapid and reliable method; however, in most cases it is required to be supported or validated with conventional cytogenetic karyotyping and some STR markers employed for QF-PCR can be more informative for a given population.