Interventions based on neurophysiologic monitoring appear to decrease the incidence of postoperative neurologic sequelae and reduce the length of stay. Inasmuch as the break-even cost for neurophysiologic monitoring is more than four times the actual average charge, both patients and hospital may profit from this service. Because this study was not a truly randomized clinical trial, unintentional statistical bias may have occurred and caution is urged in interpreting the magnitude of apparent intergroup outcome differences.

In spine deformity surgery, iatrogenic neurologic injuries might occur due to the mechanical force applied to the spinal cord from implants, instruments, and bony structures, or due to ischemic changes from vessel ligation during exposure and cord distraction/compression during corrective manoeuvres. Prompt reaction within the reversible phase (reducing of compressive/distractive forces) usually restores functionality of the spinal cord, but if those forces continue to persist, a permanent neurological deficit might be expected. With monitoring of sensory pathways (dorsal column–medial lemniscus) by somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs), such events are detected with a sensitivity of up to 92%, and a specificity of up to 100%. The monitoring of motor pathways by transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials (TceMEPs) has a sensitivity and a specificity of up to 100%, but it requires avoidance of halogenated anaesthetics and neuromuscular blockades. Different modalities of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM: SSEP, TceMEP, or combined) can be performed by the neurophysiologist, the technician or the surgeon. Combined SSEP/TceMEP performed by the neurophysiologist in the operating room is the preferable method of IONM, but it might be impractical or unaffordable in many institutions. Still, many spine deformity surgeries worldwide are performed without any type of IONM. Medicolegal aspects of IONM are different worldwide and in many cases some vagueness remains. The type of IONM that a spinal surgeon employs should be reliable, affordable, practical, and recognized by the medicolegal guidelines. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:9-16. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.180032

Neurophysiologic monitoring, including quantitative EEG, transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound and transcranial near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), can be of diagnostic value in neurocardiology-the study of dysfunctional brain-heart relationships. A new multivariate EEG technique bispectral analysis, enables the cardiologist to objectively and precisely document transient episodes of syncope and seizure. TCD permits precise determination of the nature and extent of cerebral hemodynamic irregularities, while NIRS detects frontal lobe imbalance in the delivery and consumption of oxygen. These powerful new neurophysiologic tools, coupled with traditional systemic hemodynamic and electrocardiographic measures, will undoubtedly improve the diagnostic yield in the complex determination of the causes of syncope and cardiac-based confusional stares. (J Interven Cardiol 1998; 1 1 : 197-204)

No abstract

No abstract