Papillary projections were the most typical ultrasound feature of non-invasive (borderline and low-grade) malignant serous tumors, while the presence of solid components but few, if any, papillations was the most representative feature of invasive (low-grade and high-grade) serous tumors. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Objective The aim of the study was to investigate the distribution of high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes and the role of multiple infection in preneoplastic and neoplastic cervical lesions, according to histology, age, and the number of genotypes per infection. Materials and Methods Nine hundred eighty-eight women affected by known HPV-related cervical lesions and attending the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy, from December 2006 to December 2014, were selected for a cross-sectional study. Prevalence of HPV genotypes was calculated by histology and the number of genotypes per infection. Univariate and multivariable cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2–3 versus CIN 1 risks were estimated by logistic regression models. Results Overall, HPV 16 (53.1%), HPV 31 (15.1%), and HPV 58 (6.4%) were the most frequent genotypes in precancerous lesions. At multivariable analysis, HPV 16 (p = .02), 18 (p = .013), and 56 (p = .01) were significantly associated to worsen histology, whereas HPV 39 (p = .03) and 45 (p = .03) were statistically correlated only to the increasing number of genotypes per infections. Human papillomavirus 33 was the only genotype significantly related to both the number of genotypes per infection (p = .005) and age (p = .03). Infections by HR-HPV (odds ratio [OR] = 9.48, 95% CI = 3.77–23.8, p < .001), HPV genotypes covered by current vaccines (OR = 6.28, 95% CI = 4.05–9.75, p < .001), single HPV genotype (OR = 8.13, 95% CI = 4.12–16.0, p < .001), as well as age (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.07–1.19, p < .001) were significantly associated to higher risk of CIN 2–3. Conclusions The most of CIN 2+ lesions are sustained by HR-HPV genotypes, especially the ones covered by 9-valent vaccine; therefore, the widespread use of prophylactic HPV vaccines could significantly reduce the incidence of preneoplastic and neoplastic cervical lesions.

Over 16 % of young women had at least one of the two STIs investigated. The risk of C. trachomatis infection was higher in HR-HPV infected compared to HR-HPV uninfected young women. The rate of co-infection was halved in HPV-vaccinated compared to unvaccinated women. This study underlines that HPV vaccination can confer benefits also in terms of co-infections prevention, leading to a decreased risk of developing cervical malignancies.

To evaluate the significance of HPV persistence as a predictor for the development of CIN2+ recurrence and the impact of multiple genotypes and of HPV 16/18 on recurrence risk. A prospective cohort observational study was carried out at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy, from December 2006 to December 2014. A total of 408 women surgically treated by excisional procedure for pre-neoplastic and neoplastic cervical lesions were enrolled. HPV test was performed at baseline and at first follow-up visit planned at 6 ± 3 months after treatment. Two-year cumulative incidences for relapse were estimated and compared by the Gray’s test. Overall, 96 (23.5%) patients were persistent for at least one genotype at three to nine months from baseline and 21 (5.1%) patients relapsed. The two-year cumulative relapse incidence was higher in HPV persistent patients compared to not-persistent (CIF = 27.6%, 95% CI: 16.2–40.2% versus CIF = 1.7%, 95% CI: 0.3–5.8%, p < 0.001), in women with persistent multiple infections (CIF = 27.2%, 95% CI: 7.3–52.3%, p < 0.001), and with the persistence of at least one genotype between 16 and 18, irrespective of the presence of other HR genotypes (CIF = 32.7%, 95% CI: 17.9–48.3%, p < 0.001), but not significantly different from women positive for single infections or any other HR genotype, but not for 16 and 18. The risk of CIN2+ recurrence should not be underestimated when same HPV genotype infection persists after treatment.

No abstract